Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The impact of the European Union fiscal rules on economic growth

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Castro, Vítor Manuel Alves (2007) The impact of the European Union fiscal rules on economic growth. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. (Warwick economic research papers.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Castro_twerp_794.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (347Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

This study intends to provide an empirical answer to the question of whether Maastricht and SGP fiscal rules have affected growth of European Union countries. A growth equation augmented with fiscal variables and controlling for the period in which fiscal rules were implemented in Europe is estimated over a panel of 15 EU countries (and 8 OECD countries) for the period 1970-2005 with the purpose of answering this question. The equation is estimated using both a dynamic fixed effects estimator and a recently developed pooled mean group estimator. GMM estimators are also used in a robustness analysis. Empirical results show that growth of real GDP per capita in the EU was not negatively affected in the period after Maastricht. This is the case when the recent performance of EU countries is compared both with their past performance and with the performance of other developed countries. Results even show that growth is slightly higher in the period in which the fulfilment of the 3% criteria for the deficit started to be officially assessed. Therefore, this study concludes that the institutional changes that occurred in Europe after 1992, especially the implementation of Maastricht and Stability and Growth Pact fiscal rules, should not be blamed for being harmful to growth in Europe.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Stability and Growth Pact (1997), Economic development -- European Union countries, Fiscal policy -- European Union countries, Mean value theorems (Calculus), European Union countries -- Economic conditions
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: March 2007
Number: No.794
Number of Pages: 49
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Fundação para a Ciência e a Tecnologia (FCT)
Grant number: SFRH/BD/21500/2005 (FCT)
References: Annett, Anthony (2006). Enforcement and the Stability and Growth Pact: how fiscal policy did and did not change under Europe’s fiscal framework. IMF, WP/06/116. Arellano, Manuel and Steve Bond (1991). Some specification tests for panel data: Monte Carlo evidence and an application to employment equations. Review of Economic Studies, 58, 277-298. Arestis, P., K. McCauley and M. Sawyer (2001). An alternative stability pact for the European Union. Cambridge Journal of Economics, 25, 113-130. Artis, Michael and Luca Onorante (2006). The economic importance of fiscal rules. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 5684. Barro, Robert (1991). Economic growth in a cross-section of countries. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 106, 407-443. Barro, Robert and Xavier Sala-i-Martin (1992). Convergence. Journal of Political Economy, 100, 223-251. Balassone, Fabrizio and Daniele Franco (2000). Public investment, the Stability and Growth Pact and the ‘Golden Rule’. Fiscal Studies, 21, 207-299. Bassanini, Andrea and Stefano Scarpetta (2001). The driving forces of economic growth: panel data evidence for the OECD countries. OECD Economic Studies, 33(II), 9-56. Blanchard, Olivier and Francesco Giavazzi (2004). Improving the SGP through a proper accounting of public investment. CEPR Discussion Paper No. 4220. Blundell, Richard and Stephen Bond (1998). Initial conditions and moment restrictions in dynamic panel data models. Journal of Econometrics, 87, 115-143. Bond, S., A. Hoeffler and J. Temple (2001). GMM estimation of empirical growth models. Mimeo. Buti, Marco (2006). Will the new Stability and Growth Pact succeed? An economical and political perspective. European Commission Economic Papers No. 241. Caselli, F., G. Esquivel and F. Lefort (1996). Reopening the convergence debate: a new look at cross-country growth empirics. Journal of Economic Growth, 1, 363-389. Cellini, Roberto (1997). Growth empirics: evidence from a panel of annual data. Applied Economic Letters, 4, 347-351. De Grauwe, Paul (2005). Economics of Monetary Union, 6th Ed. [Ch.9]. Oxford University Press, New York. De la Fuente, Angel and Rafael Doménech (2000). Human capital in growth regressions: how much difference does data quality make? Universidad Autónoma de Barcelona, Mimeo. Diebalek, L., W. Köhler-Töglhofer and D. Prammer (2006). Reform of the Stability and Growth Pact. Monetary Policy & The Economy, QI/06, 78-108. Ederveen, S., H. Groot and R. Nahuis (2006). Fertile soil for structural funds? A panel data analysis of the conditional effectiveness of European cohesion policy. Kyklos, 59, 17-42. Fatás, António, Jürgen von Hagen, Andrew Hughes Hallett, Rof R. Strauch and Anne Sibert (2003). Stability and Growth in Europe: towards a better Pact. CEPR, Monitoring European Integration 13. Gali, Jordi and Roberto Perotti (2003). Fiscal policy and monetary integration in Europe. NBER working Paper No. 9773. Hein, Eckhard and Achim Truger (2005). European Monetary Union: nominal convergence, real divergence and slow growth? Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, 16, 7-33. Im, K., M.H. Pesaran, Y. Shin (2003). Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics, 115, 53-74. Islam, Nazrul (1995). Growth empirics: a panel data approach. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 110, 1127-1170. Mankiw, G., David Romer and David Weil (1992). A contribution to the empirics of economic growth. Quarterly Journal of Eonomics, 107, 407-437. Marinheiro, Carlos (2004). Has the Stability and Growth Pact stabilized? CESifo-LBI Conference on “Sustainability of Public Debt”, Munich. OECD (1998-2006), Education at a Glance, various issues. OECD (2006). Statistical Compendium, April 2006. Perée, Eric and Timo Välilä (2005). Fiscal rules and public investment. Economic and Financial Report 2005/02. European Investment Bank. Pesaran, M.H., Y. Shin and R. Smith (1999). Pooled mean estimation of dynamic heterogeneous panels. Journal of American Statistical Association, 94, 621-634. Pedroni, Peter (1999). Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous panels with multiple regressors. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 61, 653-670. Roodman, David (2006). How to do xtabond2: an introduction to “difference” and “system” GMM in STATA. Center for Global Development, Working-Paper No. 103. Saint-Paul, Gilles (1992). Fiscal policy in an endogenous growth model. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 107, 1243-1259. Savona, Paolo and Carlo Viviani (2003). The impact of the Stability and growth pact on real economic growth: automatic mechanism or policy discretion? Review of Economic Conditions in Italy, 2, 263-279. Soukiazis, Elias and Vítor Castro (2003). The impact of the Maastricht criteria and the Stability and Growth Pact on growth and unemployment in Europe. CEUNEUROP Discussion Paper No. 15. Soukiazis, Elias and Vítor Castro (2005). How the Maastricht criteria and the Stability and Growth Pact affected real convergence in the European Union: a panel data analysis. Journal of Policy Modeling, 27, 385-399. Taylor, John (1993). Discretion versus policy rules in practice. Carnegie-Rochester Conference Series on Public Policy, 39, 195-214. Thirlwall, Anthony (2000). The Euro and regional divergence in Europe. Mimeo. University of Kent. Välilä, Timo and Aaron Mehrotra (2005). Evolution and determinants of public investment in Europe. Economic and Financial Report 2005/01. European Investment Bank. Verde, Antimo (2004). The Stability and Growth Pact in rainy days: an alternative view. Bank of Valletta Review, 30, 14-31. Von Hagen, Jürgen (2003). Fiscal discipline and growth in Euroland: experiences with the Stability and Growth Pact. Centre for European Integration Studies (ZEI) Working Paper B-06-2003. University of Bonn. Warin, Thierry (2005). The hidden structural features of the fiscal rule: a European saga. International Advances in Economic Research, 11, 29-38. Wyplosz, Charles (2006). European Monetary Union: the dark sides of a major success. Economic Policy, 21, 207-261.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1413

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us