CAFASP-1: Critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods
UNSPECIFIED (1999) CAFASP-1: Critical assessment of fully automated structure prediction methods. In: 3rd Meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP3), PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA, DEC, 1998. Published in: PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS (Suppl. 3). pp. 209-217.Full text not available from this repository.
The results of the first Critical Assessment of Fully Automated Structure Prediction (CAFASP-1) are presented. The objective was to evaluate the success rates of fully automatic web servers for fold recognition which are available to the community This study was based on the targets used in the third meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP-3). However, unlike CASP-3, the study was not a blind trial, as it was held after the structures of the targets were known. The aim was to assess the performance of methods without the user intervention that several groups used in their CASP-3 submissions. Although it is clear that "human plus machine" predictions are superior to automated ones, this CAFASP-1 experiment is extremely valuable for users of our methods; it provides an indication of the performance of the methods alone, and not of the "human plus machine" performance assessed in CASP, This information may aid users in choosing which programs they wish to use and in evaluating the reliability of the programs when applied to their specific prediction targets. In addition, evaluation of fully automated methods is particularly important to assess their applicability at genomic scales.
For each target, groups submitted the top-ranking folds generated from their servers. In CAFASP-1 we concentrated on fold-recognition web servers only and evaluated only recognition of the correct fold, and not, as in CASP-3, alignment accuracy. Although some performance differences appeared within each of the four target categories used here, overall, no single server has proved markedly superior to the others. The results showed that current fully automated fold recognition servers can often identify remote similarities when pairwise sequence search methods fail. Nevertheless, in only a few cases outside the family-level targets has the score of the top-ranking fold been significant enough to allow for a confident fully automated prediction. Because the goals, rules, and procedures of CAFASP-1 were different from those used at CASP-3, the results reported here are not comparable with those reported in CASP-3. Nevertheless, it is clear that current automated fold recognition methods can not yet compete with "human-expert plus machine" predictions.
Finally, CAFASP-1 has been useful in identifying the requirements for a future blind trial of automated served-based protein structure prediction. (C) 1999 Wiley-Liss, Inc.
|Item Type:||Conference Item (UNSPECIFIED)|
|Subjects:||Q Science > QD Chemistry
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
|Journal or Publication Title:||PROTEINS-STRUCTURE FUNCTION AND GENETICS|
|Number of Pages:||9|
|Page Range:||pp. 209-217|
|Title of Event:||3rd Meeting on the Critical Assessment of Techniques for Protein Structure Prediction (CASP3)|
|Location of Event:||PACIFIC GROVE, CALIFORNIA|
|Date(s) of Event:||DEC, 1998|
Actions (login required)