Who really wants to be a millionaire? Estimates of risk aversion from gameshow data
Hartley, Roger, 1946-, Lanot, Gauthier and Walker, Ian, 1954- (2006) Who really wants to be a millionaire? Estimates of risk aversion from gameshow data. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. (Warwick economic research papers).
WRAP_Hartley_twerp_747.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...
This paper analyses the behaviour of contestants in one of the most popular TV gameshows ever to estimate risk aversion. This gameshow has a number of features that makes it well suited for our analysis: the format is extremely straightforward, it involves no strategic decision-making, we have a large number of observations, and the prizes are cash and paid immediately, and cover a large range – from £100 up to £1 million. Our data sources have the virtue that we are able to check the representativeness of the gameshow participants. Even though the CRRA model is extremely restrictive we find that a coefficient or relative risk aversion which is close to unity fits the data across a wide range of wealth remarkably well.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD61 Risk Management
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Who wants to be a millionaire, Game theory, Risk assessment, Choice (Psychology), Rational choice theory|
|Series Name:||Warwick economic research papers|
|Publisher:||University of Warwick, Department of Economics|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Date:||21 April 2006|
|Number of Pages:||54|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|Funder:||Economic and Social Research Council (Great Britain) (ESRC)|
|Grant number:||R000239740 (ESRC)|
|References:||Adda, J. and R. Cooper (2003), Dynamic Economics, MIT Press: Cambridge, MA. Attanasio, O., J. Banks and S. Tanner (2002), “Asset Holding and Consumption Volatility”, Journal of Political Economy, 110(4), 771-92 Attanasio, O. and G. Weber (1989), “Intertemporal Substitution, Risk Aversion and the Euler Equation for Consumption”, Economic Journal, 99, 59-73. Bombardini, M. and F. Trebbi (2005), “Risk aversion and expected utility theory: a field experiment with large and small stakes”, mimeo, Harvard. Barsky, R. B., Juster, F. T., Kimball, M. S. and Shapiro, M. D. (1997). ‘Preference Parameters and Behavioural Heterogeneity: an Experimental Approach in the Health and Retirement Study’, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 112(2), 729–58. Beetsma, R.M. and P.C. Schotman (2001), “Measuring Risk Attitudes in a Natural Experiment: Data from the Television Game Show Lingo”, Economic Journal, 111(474), 821-48. Bombardini, M. and F., Trebbi (2005), “Risk Aversion and Expected Utility Theory: A Field Experiment with Large and Small Stakes”, mimeo Harvard University. Chetty, R. (2003), “A New Method of Estimating Risk Aversion”, NBER WP 9988. Ciccheti, C.J. and J.A. Dubin (1994), “Microeconometric Analysis of Risk Aversion and the Decision to Self-Insure”, Journal of Political Economy, 102(1), 169-86. Davidson and McKinnon (2004) Didonato, A. and A.H. Morris (1986), “Computation of the Incomplete Gamma Function Ratios and their Inverse”, ACM Transactions on Mathematical Software, 12, 377-393. Donkers, B., B. Melenberg and A. van Soest (2001), “Estimating risk attitudes using lotteries - a large sample approach”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, 22, 165-95. Epstein, L.G. and S.E. Zin (1989), “Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: A Theoretical Framework”, Econometrica, 57(4), 937-69. Epstein, L.G. and S.E. Zin (1991), “Substitution, Risk Aversion, and the Temporal Behavior of Consumption and Asset Returns: An Empirical Analysis”, Journal of Political Economy, 99(2), 263-86. Farrell, L. and I. Walker (1999), “The Welfare Effects of Lotto: Evidence from the UK”, Journal of Public Economics, 72, 99-120. French, S. (1980), “Updating of Belief in the Light of Someone Else’s Opinion”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 143, 43-48. Fullenkamp, C., R. Tenorio and R. Battalio (2003), “Assessing Individual Risk Attitudes using Field Data from Lottery Games”, Review of Economics and Statistics, 85(1), 218-26. Gertner, R. (1993), “Game Shows and Economic Behavior: Risk-Taking on Card Sharks”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 108(2), 507-21. Gouriéroux, C. and A. Monfort (1996), Simulation-Based Econometric Methods, Oxford University Press: Oxford. Hall, R.E. (1988), “Intertemporal Substitution in Consumption”, Journal of Political Economy, 96(2), 339-57. Hartog, J., A. Ferrer-i-Carbonell and N. Jonker (2000), “On a Simple Measure of Individual Risk Aversion”, Tinbergen Institute Discussion Paper TI 2000-074/3. Hersch, P.L. and G.S. McDougall (1997), “Decision Making under Uncertainty When the Stakes Are High: Evidence from a Lottery Game Show”, Southern Economic Journal, 64(1), 75-84. Holt, C.A. and S.K. Laury (2002), “Risk Aversion and Incentive Effects”, American Economic Review, 92(5): 1644-55. Jianakoplos, N.A.. and A. Bernasek (1998), “Are Women More Risk Averse?”, Economic Inquiry, 36(4), 620-30. Kahneman, D. and A. Tversky (1979), “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”, Econometrica, 47, 263-291. Kocherlakota, N.R. (1996), “The Equity Premium: It's Still a Puzzle”, Journal of Economic Literature, 34(1), 42-71. Metrick, N. (1993), “A Natural Experiment in Jeopardy!”, American Economic Review, 85(1), 240-53. Palsson, A-M. (1996), “Does the Degree of Relative Risk Aversion Vary with Household Characteristics?”, Journal of Economic Psychology, 17(6), 771-87. Poirer, D. (1995) Intermediate Statistics and Econometrics: A Comparative Approach, Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. Post, T., G. Baltussen, and M., Van den Assem (2006): “Deal or no Deal: Decision making under risk in a large payoff gameshow”, Tinbergen Institute WP 009/2. Rabin, M. (2000), “Risk Aversion and Expected-Utility Theory: A Calibration Theorem”, Econometrica, 68(5), 1281-92. Rabin, M. and R.H. Thaler (2001), “Anomalies: Risk Aversion”, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 15(1), 219-32. Szpiro, G.G. (1986), “Measuring Risk Aversion: An Alternative Approach,” The Review of Economics and Statistics , 68(1), 156-159. Train, K.E. (2003) Discrete Choice Methods with Simulation, Cambridge University Press: Cambridge.|
Actions (login required)