Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Clinical utility of the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a screen for emotional and behavioural difficulties in children and adolescents with intellectual disability

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Murray, Caitlin, Hastings, Richard P. and Totsika, Vasiliki (2021) Clinical utility of the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire as a screen for emotional and behavioural difficulties in children and adolescents with intellectual disability. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 218 (6). pp. 323-325. doi:10.1192/bjp.2020.224

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.2020.224

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

We assessed the clinical utility of the parent-reported Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire (SDQ) as a screen for emotional and behavioural difficulties in 626 children and young people with intellectual disability. Using the Developmental Behavior Checklist (DBC2-P) to determine clinical caseness, the area under the curve for the SDQ total difficulties score was 0.876 (95% CI 0.841-0.911), indicating that it is a good measure for identifying significant emotional and behavioural difficulties requiring further investigation. Analyses supported the use of the same SDQ cut-off for those with and without intellectual disability, which may assist with consistent and comparable assessment in clinical practice.

Item Type: Journal Item
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR)
SWORD Depositor: Library Publications Router
Journal or Publication Title: The British Journal of Psychiatry
Publisher: Cambridge University Press
ISSN: 1472-1465
Official Date: June 2021
Dates:
DateEvent
June 2021Published
17 November 2020Available
Volume: 218
Number: 6
Page Range: pp. 323-325
DOI: 10.1192/bjp.2020.224
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Related URLs:
  • Other Repository

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us