The Library
Implementation support improves outcomes of a fluency-based mathematics strategy : a cluster-randomized controlled trial
Tools
Owen, K. L., Hunter, S. H., Watkins, R. C., Payne, J. S., Bailey, Tom, Gray, C., Hastings, Richard P. and Hughes, J. C. (2021) Implementation support improves outcomes of a fluency-based mathematics strategy : a cluster-randomized controlled trial. Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness, 14 (3). pp. 523-542. doi:10.1080/19345747.2021.1875526 ISSN 1934-5747.
|
PDF
WRAP-implementation-support-improves-outcomes-fluency-based-mathematics-strategy-Hastings-2020.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0. Download (2356Kb) | Preview |
|
PDF
WRAP-implementation-support-improves-outcomes-fluency-based-mathematics-strategy-Hastings-2020 .pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1221Kb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/19345747.2021.1875526
Abstract
The Say-All-Fast-Minute-Every-Day-Shuffled (SAFMEDS) strategy promotes fast and accurate recall. The existing literature suggests that the strategy can help learners improve academic outcomes. Through a cluster randomized controlled trial, we assessed the impact of implementation support on children’s mathematics outcomes during a teacher-led SAFMEDS intervention. Following training and prior to baseline assessments, we randomly allocated schools to receive either no (n = 31) or ongoing (n = 33) support from a researcher. Support consisted of three in-situ visits and email contact. Assessors remained blind to the condition of the schools throughout. We analyzed the outcomes of children (nSupport = 294, nNoSupport = 281) using a multi-level mixed-effects model; accounting for the children nested within schools. The results suggest that implementation support has a small effect on children’s fluency of arithmetic facts (Mathematics Fluency and Calculation Tests (MFaCTs): Grades 1–2, d = 0.23, 95% CI: 0.06–0.40; MFaCTs: Grades 3–5, d = 0.25, 95% CI: 0.08–0.42). These results are larger than the average effect sizes reported within professional development literature that apply coaching elements to mathematics programs.
Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR) | ||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | Journal of Research on Educational Effectiveness | ||||||
Publisher: | Routledge | ||||||
ISSN: | 1934-5747 | ||||||
Official Date: | 15 June 2021 | ||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||
Volume: | 14 | ||||||
Number: | 3 | ||||||
Page Range: | pp. 523-542 | ||||||
DOI: | 10.1080/19345747.2021.1875526 | ||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||||
Date of first compliant deposit: | 14 December 2020 | ||||||
Date of first compliant Open Access: | 2 September 2021 | ||||||
Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year