The Library
Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject?
Tools
Tools
Tools
UNSPECIFIED (1999) Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject? JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 40 (3). pp. 432-453. ISSN 0749-596X
Full text not available from this repository.Abstract
According to two-process accounts of recognition memory, a familiarity-based process is followed hy a slower, more accurate, recall-like process. The dominant two-process account is the recall-to-reject account, in which this second process facilitates the rejection of similar foils. To evaluate the recall-to-reject account, we reanalyzed two experiments from Hintzman and Curran (1994) in which subjects made word recognition judgments at different response deadlines, and we conducted two new recognition experiments using pairs of similar pseudowords. The new analyses included modeling at both the group and individual subject levels. The results did not provide any distinctive evidence for recall-to-reject. In addition to discussing this two-process account, we describe a one-process account of recognition, in which dir nature of similarity information varies across the course of judgment. (C) Academic Press.
| Item Type: | Journal Article |
|---|---|
| Subjects: | P Language and Literature B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology |
| Journal or Publication Title: | JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE |
| Publisher: | ACADEMIC PRESS INC |
| ISSN: | 0749-596X |
| Date: | April 1999 |
| Volume: | 40 |
| Number: | 3 |
| Number of Pages: | 22 |
| Page Range: | pp. 432-453 |
| Publication Status: | Published |
| URI: | http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/14627 |
Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge
Actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
