Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject?
UNSPECIFIED. (1999) Two-process models of recognition memory: Evidence for recall-to-reject? JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE, 40 (3). pp. 432-453. ISSN 0749-596XFull text not available from this repository.
According to two-process accounts of recognition memory, a familiarity-based process is followed hy a slower, more accurate, recall-like process. The dominant two-process account is the recall-to-reject account, in which this second process facilitates the rejection of similar foils. To evaluate the recall-to-reject account, we reanalyzed two experiments from Hintzman and Curran (1994) in which subjects made word recognition judgments at different response deadlines, and we conducted two new recognition experiments using pairs of similar pseudowords. The new analyses included modeling at both the group and individual subject levels. The results did not provide any distinctive evidence for recall-to-reject. In addition to discussing this two-process account, we describe a one-process account of recognition, in which dir nature of similarity information varies across the course of judgment. (C) Academic Press.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||P Language and Literature
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
|Journal or Publication Title:||JOURNAL OF MEMORY AND LANGUAGE|
|Publisher:||ACADEMIC PRESS INC|
|Official Date:||April 1999|
|Number of Pages:||22|
|Page Range:||pp. 432-453|
Actions (login required)