Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

International evidence review on co-funding for training

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Dickinson, Peter and Marsden, Joel (2013) International evidence review on co-funding for training. London, UK: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-International-evidence-review-co-funding-training-2013.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Open Government Licence: OGL (v3.0).

Download (1305Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/governmen...

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Greater employer and business investment in training is vital to ensure the training delivered by the Further Education (FE) and skills system in England is high quality and responsive to economic need. Striking the right balance in sharing the costs of vocational training between Government, employers and individuals is however a complex issue.
In view of the ongoing process of FE and skills training reform, ICF GHK was commissioned by the Department for Business, Innovation and Skills (BIS) to undertake an international review of evidence on the use of employer-routed, co-funding instruments for training. The review identifies and examines the effects of different co-funding instruments and delivery models on the amount and quality of provision undertaken by employers, and considers the impacts this has on the wider skills training system.
None of the identified co-funding models are identical to the type of co-funding model that could be deduced from recent reviews and policy statements, for example, the Richard Review and the Government’s response to it. However, in keeping with such intentions, all are aimed at increasing employer investment in appropriate and high quality FE and skills training in order to increase workplace productivity and thereby international competitiveness.

Item Type: Report
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
L Education > LC Special aspects of education > LC5201 Education extension. Adult education. Continuing education
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Institute for Employment Research
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Occupational training, Occupational training -- Finance, Federal aid to occupational training , Apprenticeship programs , Vocational education , Education, Cooperative
Publisher: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
Place of Publication: London, UK
Official Date: July 2013
Dates:
DateEvent
July 2013Published
Number: 116
Number of Pages: 126
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Copyright Holders: Department for Business, Innovation and Skills
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
UNSPECIFIEDDepartment for Business, Innovation and Skillshttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004800
Open Access Version:
  • https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk...

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us