Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Retained earnings dynamic, internal promotions and Walrasian equilibrium

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Beker, Pablo (2004) Retained earnings dynamic, internal promotions and Walrasian equilibrium. Discussion Paper. [Valencia]: Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas. (Working paper (Ivie), Vol.14).

[img]
Preview
PDF
wrap_beker_wpasad-2004-14.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (1018Kb)

Abstract

In the early stages of the process of industry evolution, firms are financially constrained and might pay different wages if workers have heterogeneous expectations about the prospects for advancement offered by each firm's job ladder. This paper argues that, nevertheless, if the output market is competitive, the positive predictions of the perfectly competitive model are still a good description of the long run outcome. If firms maximize the discounted sum of constrained profits, financing expenditure out of retained earnings, profits are driven down to zero as the perfectly competitive model predicts. Ex ante identical firms may follow different growth paths in which workers work for a lower entry-wage in firms expected to grow more. In the steady state, however, workers performing the same job, in ex-ante identical firms, receive the same wage. I explain when the long run outcome is efficient, when it is not, and why firms that produce inefficiently might drive the efficient ones out of the market even when the steady state has the positive properties of a Walrasian equilibrium. To some extent, it is not technological efficiency but workers' self-fulfilling expectations about their prospects for advancement within the firm what explains which firms have lower unit costs, grow more, and dominate the market.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Discussion Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Business enterprises, Labor supply
Series Name: Working paper (Ivie)
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Economic Theory
Publisher: Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas
Place of Publication: [Valencia]
ISSN: 0022-0531
Date: March 2004
Volume: Vol.14
Number of Pages: 55
Page Range: pp. 114-156
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: Working paper.
Funder: Spain. Ministerio de Ciencia y Tecnología (MCT), Instituto Valenciano de Investigaciones Económicas (IVIE)
Grant number: BEC2001-0980 (MCT)
Version or Related Resource: Later realised as: Beker, P.F. (2007). Retained earnings dynamic, internal promotions and Walrasian equilibrium. Journal of Economic Theory, 39(1), pp.114-156. http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/30416/
Related URLs:
  • Related item in WRAP
References: [1] A. Alchian, Uncertainty, Evolution, and Economic Theory, J. of Political Economy, 58 (1950), 211 - 221. [2] W. B. Arthur, Competing Technologies, Increasing Returns and Lock-In By Historical Events, The Economic Journal 99 (1989), 116-131. [3] F. Allen and D. Gale, “Comparing Financial Systems”, The MIT Press, Cambridge, Massachusets, 2000. [4] P. Beker, Are Inefficient Entrepreneurs Driven Out of the Market?, Journal of Economic Theory 114 (2004), 329-344. [5] L. Blume and D. Easley, Optimality and Natural Selection in Markets, Journal of Economic Theory 107 (2002), 95-135. [6] P. Doeringer and M. Piore, “Internal Labor Markets and Manpower Analysis”, D.C. Heath and Company, Massachusetts, 1971. [7] M. Feldman and C. Gilles, An Expository Note on Individual Risk without Aggregate Uncertainty, Journal of Economic Theory 35 (1985), 26-32. [8] M. Friedman, “Three Essays on the State of Economic Science”, University of Chicago Press, Chicago,1953. [9] J. Malcomsom, Work Incentives, Hierarchy, and Internal Labor Markets, Journal of Political Economy 92 (1984), 486-507. [10] R. Nelson and S. Winter, “An evolutionary Theory of Economic Change”, The Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, 1982. [11] S. Rosen, Implicit Contracts: A Survey, Journal of Economic Literature 23 (1985), 1144-1175. [12] J. Stiglitz and A.Weiss, Credit Rationing inMarkets with Imperfect Information, The American Economic Review (1981), 393 - 410. [13] M. Waldman, Job Assignments, Signaling, and Efficiency, The Rand Journal of Economics 15 (1984), 255-267 [14] S. Winter, Economic Natural Selection and the Theory of the Firm, Yale Economic Essays 4 (1964), 225- 272. [15] S. Winter, Satisficing, Selection and the Innovating Remnant, Quarterly Journal of Economics 85 (1971), 237-261. [16] S. Winter, Optimization and Evolution in the Theory of the Firm, in “Adaptive Economic Models”, (R. H. Day and T. Groves, Eds), pp. 73-118, Academic Press, New York, 1975.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/148

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us