Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Comments on the paper: on repeated parameter sampling in Monte Carlo simulations

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (1999) Comments on the paper: on repeated parameter sampling in Monte Carlo simulations. ECOLOGICAL MODELLING, 115 (1). pp. 95-98. ISSN 0304-3800

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

Variability enters ecological systems at many different levels, from the differences between organisms and their individual life histories, to differences in the species composition of communities and changes in the external environment. Incorporating this variability into models, or accounting for it in analyses, is an increasingly important part of ecological modelling. One of the (many) ways variability or uncertainty enters models of ecological systems is in the assignment of values to physiological or interactive parameters. Introducing a technique known as stochastic parameters, Kremer [Ecol. Model. 18, (1983) 187-207] modelled parameters as time-variant, with their values being periodically chosen from prescribed distributions. Such an approach aims to model real-time variability in the ecological systems studied, but differs from traditional Monte Carlo simulations in which parameters are assumed time-invariant and stochasticity enters to model uncertainty in their measurement. Annan [Ecol. Model. 97 (1997) 111-115] examines the distinction between these two methods and proposes that suitably 'corrected' Monte Carlo simulations can replicate (and, therefore, supplant) those using stochastic parameters. In this paper, this proposal is examined and the fundamental assumptions which frame it are questioned. While Annan's simple analysis sheds light on one facet of Kremer's results, it does not justify his general conclusions. (C) 1999 Elsevier Science B.V. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
Journal or Publication Title: ECOLOGICAL MODELLING
Publisher: ELSEVIER SCIENCE BV
ISSN: 0304-3800
Date: 1 February 1999
Volume: 115
Number: 1
Number of Pages: 4
Page Range: pp. 95-98
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/14829

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us