Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Political parties and coalition formation

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Dhillon, Amrita (2003) Political parties and coalition formation. Working Paper. University of Warwick, Department of Economics, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Dhillon_twerp697.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (265Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

This chapter gives a flavour of recent theoretical work on coalition formation and political parties. I survey recent work on both pre-election coalition formation and post election coalition (or government) formation. A number of alternative rationales for the formation of parties are compared with the help of some illustrative examples.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Political parties, Coalitions, Coalition governments, Electoral coalitions, Legislative bodies
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: December 2003
Number: No.697
Number of Pages: 60
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: 1. Aldrich, John H, 1995 \Why Parties? The Origin and Transformation of Political Parties in America." Chicago, University of Chicago Press. 2. Austen-Smith, D., 1983,"The Spatial Theory of Electoral Competition: Instability, Institutions and Information", Environment and Planning C 1, pp. 439{59. 3. Austen-Smith,D., 1986,"Legislative Coalitions and Electoral Equilibrium", Public Choice, 50, pp.185{210. 4. Austen Smith, D and J.Banks, 1988, \Elections, Coalitions and Legislative Outcomes", American Political Science Review, Vol. 82, pp. 405{422 5. Axelrod, R., 1970, \The Conflict of Interest", Chicago, Marham. 6. Bandhopadhyaya, S and M.P. Oak, \Party Formation and Coalitional Bargaining in a model of proportional representation", mimeo. 7. Baron, D., 1989,"A Non Cooperative Theory of Legislative Coalitions", American Journal of Political Science, Vol. 33, pp.1048{1084. 8. Baron, David P., 1993, \Government Formation and Endogenous Parties", American Political Science Review, Vol 87, Issue 1, March 1993, pp.34{47. 9. Besley, T. and S.Coate, 1997, \An Economic Model of Representative Democracy", Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol.112, No.1, pp. 85{106. 10. Calvert, R., 1986,"Models of Imperfect Information in Politics", London, Harwood Academic. 11. Downs, A., 1957"An Economic Theory of Democracy", New York: Harper and Row. 12. Duverger,M., 1954 Political Parties, Wiley and Sons, New York. 13. Duverger,M., 1963, Political Parties: their organisation and activity in the modern state, North, B and North R., tr.New York: Wiley, Science Ed. 14. Enelow, J.M. and M.J.Hinich,1984,"The Spatial Theory of Voting: An Introduction", Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. 15. Gerber,Anke and I.Ortuno-Ortin, 1998, \Political Compromise and Endogenous Formation of Coalitions", Social Choice and Welfare, 15, pp. 445-454. 16. Gomberg, A.M , Marhuenda, F and I.Ortuno Ortin, 2001, \Equilibrium in a Model of Endogenous Political Party Formation", forthcoming in Economic Theory. 17. Jackson, M.O. and Boaz Moselle, \Coalition and Party Formation in a Legislative Voting Game", Journal of Economic Theory, Vol.103 No.1, 2002, pp. 49{87. 18. Krehbiel,K., 1993, \Wheres the Party?", British Journal of Political Science, Vol. 23 pp. 235{266. 19. Levy, G. , 2002A, \A Model of Political Parties", forthcoming in Journal of Economic Theory. 20. Levy, G., 2002B, \Endogenous Parties: Cooperative and Non cooperative analysis", mimeo, London School of Economics. 21. McKelvey,R., 1976, \Intransitivities in Multi-dimensional Voting Models and Some Implications for Agenda Control", Journal of Economic Theory, 12, pp.471{82. 22. Morelli, M., 2001, \Party Formation and Policy Outcomes under different electoral systems", forthcoming Review of Economic Studies. 23. Osborne, M.J. and A.Slivinski, 1996, \A Model of Political Competition with Citizen-Candidates", Quarterly Journal of Economics, 111, pp.65{96. 24. Osborne, M.J. and R. Tourky, 2002, \Party Formation in Collective Decision making" mimeo, University of Toronto. 25. Ray, D and R. Vohra, 1997, \Equilibrium Binding Agreements", Journal of Economic Theory, 73, pp.30{78. 26. Riker, 1962, \The theory of political coalitions", Yale University Press: New Haven. 27. Riviere, A." Citizen Candidacy, Party Formation and Duverger's Law", 1999, mimeo, Royal Holloway, University of London. 28. Roemer, J., \Political Competition: Theory and Applications (Harvard University Press, 2001). 29. Scho�eld, N.J., 1993,"Party Competition in a Spatial Model of Coalition Formation", in \Political Economy: Institutions, Competition and Representation" eds W.A. Barnett, M.J.Hinich and N.J. Scho�eld, 1993, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press,pp. 135{174. 30. Shepsle, K., 1986, \The positive theory of legislative coalitions: An enrichment of social choice and spatial models", Public Choice, 50,pp. 135{78. 31. Shepsle, K.,1979, "Institutional Arrangements and Equilibrium in Multidimensional Voting Models", American Journal of Political Science, 23, pp.27{60. 32. Snyder,J. and M.Ting, 2002, \An Informational Rationale for Political Parties", American Journal of Political Science, Vol.46 No.1, pp.90{110. 33. Strom, K., 1990, \A Behavioural Theory of Competitive Political Parties", American Journal of Political Science, Vol.34, N0.2, pp.565{98
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1491

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us