Hughes, Sarah E., Aiyegbusi, Olalekan Lee, Lasserson, Daniel , Collis, Philip, Cruz-Rivera, Samantha, McMullan, Christel, Turner, Grace M., Glasby, Jon and Calvert, Melanie (2021) Protocol for a scoping review exploring the use of patient reported outcomes in adult social care. BMJ Open, 11 . e045206. doi:10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045206 ISSN 2044-6055.

Preview	PDF WRAP-protocol-scoping-review-exploring-use-patient-reported-outcomes-adult-social-care-Lasserson-2021.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (368Kb) | Preview
	PDF WRAP-Protocol-scoping-review-exploring-patient-adult-social-care-2021.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1067Kb)

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Introduction: Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are measures of a person’s own views of their health, functioning and quality of life. They are typically assessed using validated, self-completed questionnaires known as patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). PROMs are used in healthcare settings to support care planning, clinical decision-making, patient–practitioner communication and quality improvement. PROMs have a potential role in the delivery of social care where people often have multiple and complex long-term health conditions. However, the use of PROMs in this context is currently unclear. The objective of this scoping review is to explore the evidence relating to the use of PROMs in adult social care.

Methods and analyses: The electronic databases Medline (Ovid), PsychInfo (Ovid), ASSIA (ProQuest), Social Care Online (SCIE), Web of Science and EMBASE (Ovid) were searched on 29 September 2020 to identify eligible studies and other publically available documents published since 2010. A grey literature search and hand searching of citations and reference lists of the included studies will also be undertaken. No restrictions on study design or language of publication will be applied. Screening and data extraction will be completed independently by two reviewers. Quality appraisal of the included documents will use the Critical Appraisal Skills Programme and AACODS (Authority, Accuracy, Coverage, Objectivity, Date, Significance) checklists. A customised data charting table will be used for data extraction, with analysis of qualitative data using the framework method. The review findings will be presented as tables and in a narrative summary.

Ethics and dissemination: Ethical review is not required as scoping reviews are a form of secondary data analysis that synthesise data from publically available sources. Review findings will be shared with service users and other relevant stakeholders and disseminated through a peer-reviewed publication and conference presentations. This protocol is registered on the Open Science Framework (www.osf.io).

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
Divisions:	Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Outcome assessment (Medical care), Patient satisfaction, Medical care -- Great Britain, Medical care -- Evaluation
Journal or Publication Title:	BMJ Open
Publisher:	BMJ
ISSN:	2044-6055
Official Date:	13 April 2021
Dates:	Date Event 13 April 2021 Published 13 April 2021 Available 12 March 2021 Accepted
Volume:	11
Article Number:	e045206
DOI:	10.1136/bmjopen-2020-045206
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit:	16 March 2021
Date of first compliant Open Access:	14 April 2021
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:	Project/Grant ID RIOXX Funder Name Funder ID UNSPECIFIED National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration (ARC) West Midlands UNSPECIFIED
Related URLs:	Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads