The Library

Naming and recognition of six foot lesions of sheep using written and pictorial information: a study of 809 English sheep farmers

Tools

Kaler, Jasmeet and Green, Laura E.. (2008) Naming and recognition of six foot lesions of sheep using written and pictorial information: a study of 809 English sheep farmers. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol.83 (No.1). pp. 52-64. ISSN 0167-5877

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Kaler_0676414-bs-260809-kaler_and_green_farmer_recognitionaccepted_.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (235Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.06.003 ...

Abstract

In 2005, 3000 questionnaires were sent to a random sample of English sheep farmers from a list kept by the English Beef and Lamb Executive (EBLEX) to investigate whether farmers could correctly name six common foot lesions in sheep from a characteristic picture and a written description. The lesions were interdigital dermatitis (ID), footrot (FR), contagious ovine digital dermatitis (CODD), shelly hoof, foot abscess and toe granuloma. In addition, farmers were asked to report the total percent of lame sheep in their flock in 2004 and the percent of this lameness attributable to each of the six lesions listed above. The overall response percentage was 44 with a useable response of 32%.

Fifty-nine farmers out of 262 (23%) who answered all six questions named all six lesions correctly. This was greater than expected by chance. The same questionnaire of six lesions was presented at a meeting of specialist sheep advisors, primarily veterinarians, 37/47 (79%) responders named all six lesions correctly.

From the six lesions listed above, the percent correctly named by farmers was approximately 83%, 85%, 36%, 28%, 65% and 43% and the percent incorrectly attributed to another lesion was 5%, 47%, 10%, 13%, 35% and 7%, respectively. The most commonly used incorrect name was FR, with farmers tending to name any hoof horn lesion as FR. A comparison of the distribution of sheep lame by a lesion correctly named compared with the same lesion incorrectly named as FR suggested that farmers recognised lesions but did not name them correctly; the distribution of lameness fitted the pattern for the correctly named lesion rather than the pattern of lameness attributed to FR. The results were validated with farm visits and a repeatability study of the questionnaire.

The mean farmer-estimated prevalence for all lameness was 10.4%; with 6.9%, 3.7%, 2.4%, 1.9%, 0.9% and 0.8% of the sheep lame with ID, FR, CODD, shelly hoof, foot abscess and toe granuloma respectively from respondents who correctly named these lesions. Whilst ID and FR were the most prevalent causes of lameness in most flocks it is possible that in up to 17% flocks the primary cause of lameness was a different lesion.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

S Agriculture > SF Animal culture

Divisions:

Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Biological Sciences ( -2010)

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

English Beef & Lamb Executive , Lameness in sheep, Sheep -- Diseases, Footrot in sheep, Sheep -- Infections

Journal or Publication Title:

Preventive Veterinary Medicine

Publisher:

Elsevier BV

ISSN:

0167-5877

Official Date:

1 January 2008

Dates:

Date	Event
1 January 2008	Published

Volume:

Vol.83

Number:

No.1

Page Range:

pp. 52-64

Identification Number:

10.1016/j.prevetmed.2007.06.003

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

Funder:

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Great Britain) (BBSRC)

References:

Cannon and Roe, 1982 R.M. Cannon and R.T. Roe, Livestock Disease Surveys: A Field Manual for Veterinarians, Australian Government Publishing Service, Canberra (1982).

Goddard et al., 2006 P. Goddard, T. Waterhouse, C. Dwyer and A. Stott, The perception of the welfare of sheep in extensive systems, Small Rumin. Res. 62 (2006), pp. 215–225.

Grogono-Thomas and Johnston, 1997 R. Grogono-Thomas and A.M. Johnston, A Study of Ovine Lameness. MAFF Final Report MAFF Open Contract OC59 45K, DEFRA Publications, London (1997).

Green et al., 2007 L.E. Green, G.J. Wassink, R. Grogono-Thomas, L.J. Moore and G.F. Medley, Looking after the individual disease in flock: a binomial mixed effects model investigating the impact of individual sheep management of footrot and interdigital dermatitis in prospective longitudinal study on one farm, Prev. Vet. Med. 78 (2007), pp. 172–178.

Hosie, 2003 B. Hosie, Ovine foot-rot: a Scottish perspective, Proc. Sheep Vet. Soc. 27 (2003), p. 65.

Kelsey et al., 1996 J.L. Kelsey, A.S. Whittemore, A.S. Evans and W. Thompson, Measurement. I Questionnaires. In: J.L. Kelsey, A.S. Whittemore, A.S. Evans and W. Thompson, Editors, Methods in Observational Epidemiology, Oxford University Press, New York (1996), pp. 364–390.

Landis and Koch, 1977 J.R. Landis and G.G. Koch, The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data, Biometrics 33 (1) (1977), pp. 159–174.

O’Toole et al., 1986 B.I. O’Toole, D. Battistuta, A. Long and K. Crouch, A comparison of costs and data quality of three health survey methods: mail, telephone and personal home interview, Am. J. Epidemiol. 124 (1986), pp. 317–328.

Petrie and Watson, 1999 A. Petrie and P. Watson, Statistics for Veterinary and Animal Science, Iowa State University Press, Amsterdam (1999).

Sargeant and Martin, 1998 J.M. Sargeant and S.W. Martin, The dependence of kappa on attribute prevalence when assessing the repeatability of questionnaire data, Prev. Vet. Med. 34 (2–3) (1998), pp. 115–123.

Vaillancourt et al., 1991 J.-P. Vaillancourt, G. Martineau, M. Morrow, W. Marsh and A. Robinson, Construction of questionnaires and their use in veterinary medicine. In: M.V. Thrusfield, Editor, Proc. Society for Veterinary Epidemiology and Preventive Medicine (SVEPM) Annual Conference, April 17–19, London, SVEPM, London (1991), pp. 94–106.

Wassink et al., 2003a G.J. Wassink, L.J. Moore, R. Grogono-Thomas and L.E. Green, Exploratory findings on the prevalence of contagious ovine digital dermatitis in sheep in England and Wales during 1999 to 2000, Vet. Rec. 152 (2003), pp. 504–506.

Wassink et al., 2003b G.J. Wassink, R. Grogono-Thomas, L.J. Moore and L.E. Green, Risk factors associated with the prevalence of footrot in sheep from 1999 to 2000, Vet. Rec. 152 (2003), pp. 351–358.

Wassink et al., 2004 G.J. Wassink, R. Grogono-Thomas, L.J. Moore and L.E. Green, Risk factors associated with the prevalence of interdigital dermatitis in sheep from 1999 to 2000, Vet. Rec. 154 (2004), pp. 551–555.

Wassink et al., 2005 G.J. Wassink, L.J. Moore, R. Grogono-Thomas and L.E. Green, Footrot and interdigital dermatitis in sheep: farmers’ practices, opinions and attitudes, Vet. Rec. 157 (2005), p. 761.

Winter, 2004a A. Winter, Lameness in sheep. Diagnosis, In Practice 26 (2004), pp. 58–63.

Winter, 2004b A. Winter, Lameness in sheep. Treatment and control, In Practice 26 (2004), pp. 130–139.

URI:

http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1503

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record