The Library

Farmers' practices and factors associated with the prevalence of all lameness and lameness attributed to interdigital dermatitis and footrot in sheep flocks in England in 2004

Tools

Kaler, Jasmeet and Green, Laura E.. (2009) Farmers' practices and factors associated with the prevalence of all lameness and lameness attributed to interdigital dermatitis and footrot in sheep flocks in England in 2004. Preventive Veterinary Medicine, Vol.92 (No.1-2). pp. 52-59. ISSN 0167-5877

Preview

PDF
WRAP_Kaler_0676414-bs-260809-kaler_and_green_2009.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (130Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.08.001

Abstract

The aim of this study was to investigate whether the risk factors associated with all causes of lameness in sheep differed from those associated with the lesion specific causes of lameness, interdigital dermatitis (ID) and footrot (FR). A total of 809 randomly selected English sheep farmers participated in a postal survey in 2005. Data were requested on their management of lameness in 2004 and whether this had changed from 2003 and the prevalence of all lameness, and lameness caused by ID and FR. The farmer ability to recognise ID and FR was assessed from their responses to a written and pictorial description. On 443 farms where both ID and FR were correctly named by the farmer, the mean prevalence of all lameness, and lameness caused by ID and FR were 10.0% (95% CI: 8.9, 10.8), 6.5% (95% CI: 5.8, 7.3) and 3.1% (95% CI: 2.8, 3.6), respectively. The mean prevalence of all lameness on all 809 farms was not significantly different at 10.2% (95% CI: 9.2, 11.0). The data were analysed using negative binomial regression models with the three outcomes farmer estimated prevalence of all lameness and lameness caused by ID or FR in 2004. Farmers who changed management of sheep between 2003 and 2004 were excluded from the analysis, thus all fixed effects were the farmers’ managements in 2003 and 2004 to ensure that the management was in place for at least one year before the prevalence estimates. Routine foot trimming ≥once/year compared with no routine foot trimming was significantly associated with an increased prevalence of all lameness (prevalence ratio (PR) = 1.34), ID (PR = 1.50) and FR (PR = 1.35). Footbathing was also significantly associated with increased prevalence of all lameness (PR = 1.67), ID (PR = 1.68) and FR (PR = 1.76). A stocking density of >8 ewes/ha was associated with a significantly increased prevalence of all lameness (PR = 1.26) and ID (PR = 1.39). There was a significantly lower prevalence of FR (PR = 0.73; PR = 0.70, respectively) on farms in the North East and South East of England. Separating lame sheep at pasture was associated with a decreased prevalence of all lameness and ID (PR = 0.75; PR = 0.73) and location of the farm in South East England was associated with a lower prevalence of all lameness and ID (PR = 0.75; PR = 0.71, respectively). We conclude that management factors associated with all lameness, and lameness attributed to ID and FR are similar.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	S Agriculture > SF Animal culture
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Biological Sciences ( -2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	English Beef & Lamb Executive, Lameness in sheep, Footrot in sheep, Sheep -- Infections, Sheep -- Diseases
Journal or Publication Title:	Preventive Veterinary Medicine
Publisher:	Elsevier BV
ISSN:	0167-5877
Date:	1 November 2009
Volume:	Vol.92
Number:	No.1-2
Page Range:	pp. 52-59
Identification Number:	10.1016/j.prevetmed.2009.08.001
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Great Britain) (BBSRC)
References:	Amory et al., 2006 J.R. Amory, P. Kloosterman, Z.E. Barker, J.L. Wright, R.W. Blowey and L.E. Green, Risk factors for reduced locomotion in dairy cattle on nineteen farms in the Netherlands, J. Dairy Sci. 89 (2006), pp. 1509–1515. Anon., 2004 Anon., 2004. Monthly Weather Summary Meteorological office. Bracknell, Meteorological Office. www.met-office.gov.uk (accessed June 2007). Beveridge, 1941 Beveridge, W.I.B., 1941. Footrot in sheep: a transmissible disease due to infection with Fusiformis nodosus. Studies on its Cause, Epidemiology and Control. Council for Scientific and Industrial Research, Bulletin No. 140. Cameron and Trivedi, 1998 A.C. Cameron and P.K. Trivedi, Regression Analysis of Count Data, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge (1998). Cox and Wermuth, 1996 D.R. Cox and N. Wermuth, Multivariate Dependencies—Models, Analysis and Interpretation, Chapman & Hall, London (1996). Dohoo et al., 2003 I. Dohoo, W. Martin and H. Stryhn, Veterinary Epidemiologic Research (1st ed.), AVC Inc., Prince Edward Island, Canada (2003). Egerton et al., 1969 J.R. Egerton, D.S. Roberts and I.M. Parsonson, The aetiology and pathogenesis of ovine footrot. I. A histological study of the bacterial invasion, J. Comput. Pathol. 81 (1969), pp. 179–185. Green and George, 2008 L.E. Green and T.R.N. George, Assessment of current knowledge of footrot in sheep with particular reference to Dichelobacter nodosus and implications for elimination or control strategies for sheep in Great Britain, Vet. J. 175 (2008), pp. 173–180. Green et al., 2007 L.E. Green, G.J. Wassink, R. Grogono-Thomas, L.J. Moore and G.F. Medley, Looking after the individual to reduce disease in the flock: a binomial mixed effects model investigating the impact of individual sheep management of footrot and interdigital dermatitis in a prospective longitudinal study on one farm, Prev. Vet. Med. 78 (2007), pp. 172–178. Hawker, 2008 Hawker, E.M., 2008. An Intervention Study to Minimise Footrot in Sheep. MSc. University of Warwick. Kaler and Green, 2008a J. Kaler and L.E. Green, Naming and recognition of six foot lesions of sheep using written and pictorial information: a study of 809 English sheep farmers, Prev. Vet. Med. 83 (2008), pp. 52–64. Kaler and Green, 2008b J. Kaler and L.E. Green, Recognition of lameness and decisions to catch for inspection among farmers and sheep specialists in GB, BMC Vet. Res. 4 (2008), p. 41. Moore et al., 2005 L.J. Moore, G.J. Wassink, L.E. Green and R. Grogono-Thomas, The detection and characterisation of Dichelobacter nodosus from cases of ovine footrot in England and Wales, Vet. Microbiol. 108 (2005), pp. 57–67. Morgan, 1987 K. Morgan, Footrot, In Pract. 9 (1987), pp. 124–129. Parsonson et al., 1967 I.M. Parsonson, J.R. Egerton and D.S. Roberts, Ovine interdigital dermatitis, J. Comput. Pathol. 77 (1967), pp. 309–313. Roberts and Egerton, 1969 D.S. Roberts and J.R. Egerton, The aetiology and pathogenesis of ovine foot-rot. II. The pathogenic association of Fusiformis nodosus and F. necrophorum, J. Comput. Pathol. 79 (1969), pp. 217–227. Wassink et al., 2003 G.J. Wassink, R. Grogono-Thomas, L.J. Moore and L.E. Green, Risk factors associated with the prevalence of footrot in sheep from 1999 to 2000, Vet. Rec. 152 (2003), pp. 351–358. Wassink et al., 2004 G.J. Wassink, R. Grogono-Thomas, L.J. Moore and L.E. Green, Risk factors associated with the prevalence of interdigital dermatitis in sheep from 1999 to 2000, Vet. Rec. 154 (2004), pp. 551–555. Winter, 1989 Winter, A., 1989. Lameness in Sheep. The Moredun Foundation News Sheet 3.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1504