Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Does judgment improve macroeconomic density forecasts?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Galvão, Ana Beatriz, Garratt, Anthony and Mitchell, James (2021) Does judgment improve macroeconomic density forecasts? International Journal of Forecasting, 37 (3). pp. 1247-1260. doi:10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.02.007 ISSN 0169-2070.

[img] PDF
WRAP-does-judgment-improve-macroeconomic-density-forecasts-Galvao-2021.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only until 29 March 2023. Contact author directly, specifying your specific needs. - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (2737Kb)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.02.007

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This paper presents empirical evidence on how judgmental adjustments affect the accuracy of macroeconomic density forecasts. Judgment is defined as the difference between professional forecasters’ densities and the forecast densities from statistical models. Using entropic tilting, we evaluate whether judgments about the mean, variance and skew improve the accuracy of density forecasts for UK output growth and inflation. We find that not all judgmental adjustments help. Judgments about point forecasts tend to improve density forecast accuracy at short horizons and at times of heightened macroeconomic uncertainty. Judgments about the variance hinder at short horizons, but can improve tail risk forecasts at longer horizons. Judgments about skew in general take value away, with gains seen only for longer horizon output growth forecasts when statistical models took longer to learn that downside risks had reduced with the end of the Great Recession. Overall, density forecasts from statistical models prove hard to beat.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Finance Group
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Economic forecasting, Forecasting, Judgment, Decision making -- Econometric models
Journal or Publication Title: International Journal of Forecasting
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0169-2070
Official Date: July 2021
Dates:
DateEvent
July 2021Published
29 March 2021Available
21 February 2021Accepted
Volume: 37
Number: 3
Page Range: pp. 1247-1260
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijforecast.2021.02.007
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Date of first compliant deposit: 26 March 2021
Is Part Of: 1
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us