Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Neither ‘crisis light’ nor ‘business as usual’ : considering the distinctive ethical issues raised by contingency and reset phases of a pandemic

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Frith, Lucy, Draper, Heather, Baines, Paul, Fovargue, Sara, Redhead, Caroline and Chiumento, Anna (2021) Neither ‘crisis light’ nor ‘business as usual’ : considering the distinctive ethical issues raised by contingency and reset phases of a pandemic. The American Journal of Bioethics, 21 (8). pp. 34-37. doi:10.1080/15265161.2021.1940363 ISSN 1526-5161.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Neither-crisis-light-business-usual-distinctive-ethical-issues-contingency-phases-2021.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1775Kb) | Preview
[img] PDF
WRAP-Neither-crisis-light-business-usual-distinctive-ethical-issues-contingency-phases-2021.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (1109Kb)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/15265161.2021.1940363

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

We have been researching the distinctive ethical issues raised by what we have called “the reset period,” when non-Covid services resumed alongside the continuing pandemic in the UK. In this commentary, we will first consider the similarities and differences between the reset and contingency phases, as described by Alfandre et al. We will then unpack Alfandre et al.’s position that the contingency phase should be characterized by operating a standard of care that is functionally equivalent to “usual” practice, arguing that in the reset and contingency phases, the standards of “usual” care may be unobtainable and, in these circumstances, we cannot fall back on the primacy of “patient centered care.” Consequently, different ethical principles and balancing strategies are needed when care is neither “crisis light” nor “business as usual.” We will conclude by reflecting on what these should be.

Item Type: Journal Article
Alternative Title: Commentary on Alfandre et al Between Usual and Crisis Phases of a Public Health Emergency : The Mediating Role of Contingency Measures
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Journal or Publication Title: The American Journal of Bioethics
Publisher: Routledge
ISSN: 1526-5161
Official Date: 27 July 2021
Dates:
DateEvent
27 July 2021Published
27 May 2021Accepted
Volume: 21
Number: 8
Page Range: pp. 34-37
DOI: 10.1080/15265161.2021.1940363
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 2 June 2021
Date of first compliant Open Access: 29 September 2021
Is Part Of: 1
Related URLs:
  • Publisher

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us