The Library
Development of a performance monitoring instrument for rating explosives search dog performance
Tools
Tools
Tools
Rooney, Nicola J. and Clark, Corinna C. A. (2021) Development of a performance monitoring instrument for rating explosives search dog performance. Frontiers In Veterinary Science, 484 . 545382. doi:10.3389/fvets.2021.545382 ISSN 2297-1769.
|
PDF
WRAP-development-performance-monitoring-instrument-rating-explosives-search-dog-performance-Clark-2021.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (479Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.3389/fvets.2021.545382
Abstract
The growing body of working dog literature includes many examples of scales robustly developed to measure aspects of dog behavior. However, when comparing behavior to working dog ability, most studies rely on training organizations' own long-established ratings of performance, or simply pass/fail at selection or certification as measures of success. Working ability is multifaceted, and it is likely that different aspects of ability are differentially affected by external factors. In order to understand how specific aspects of selection, training, and operations influence a dog's working ability, numerous facets of performance should be considered. An accurate and validated method for quantifying multiple aspects of performance is therefore required. Here, we describe the first stages of formulating a meaningful performance measurement tool for two types of working search dogs. The systematic methodology used was: (1) interviews and workshops with a representative cross-section of stakeholders to produce a shortlist of behaviors integral to current operational performance of vehicle (VS) and high assurance (HAS) search dogs; (2) assessing the reliability and construct validity of the shortlisted behavioral measures (at the behavior and the individual rater level) using ratings of diverse videoed searches by experienced personnel; and (3) selecting the most essential and meaningful behaviors based on their reliability/validity and importance. The resulting performance measurement tool was composed of 12 shortlisted behaviors, most of which proved reliable and valid when assessed by a group of raters. At the individual rater level, however, there was variability between raters in the ability to use and interpret behavioral measures, in particular, more abstract behaviors such as Independence. This illustrates the importance of examining individual rater scores rather than extrapolating from group consensus (as is often done), especially when designing a tool that will ultimately be used by single raters. For ratings to be practically valuable, individual rater reliability needs to be improved, especially for behaviors deemed as essential (e.g., control and confidence). We suggest that the next steps are to investigate why individuals vary in their ratings and to undertake efforts to increase the likelihood that they reach a common conceptualization of each behavioral construct. Plausible approaches are improving the format in which behaviors are presented, e.g., by adding benchmarks and utilizing rater training.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | Q Science > Q Science (General) S Agriculture > SF Animal culture U Military Science > U Military Science (General) |
||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Social Science & Systems in Health (SSSH) Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Working dogs , Animal behavior , Dogs --Behavior, Search dogs -- Training , Animals -- War use | ||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Frontiers In Veterinary Science | ||||||
| Publisher: | Frontiers Research Foundation | ||||||
| ISSN: | 2297-1769 | ||||||
| Official Date: | 7 June 2021 | ||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||
| Volume: | 484 | ||||||
| Article Number: | 545382 | ||||||
| DOI: | 10.3389/fvets.2021.545382 | ||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 8 June 2021 | ||||||
| Date of first compliant Open Access: | 10 June 2021 | ||||||
| RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
||||||
| Is Part Of: | 1 | ||||||
| Open Access Version: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
