Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Strategic trade policy reconsidered: National rivalry vs free trade vs international cooperation

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

UNSPECIFIED (1998) Strategic trade policy reconsidered: National rivalry vs free trade vs international cooperation. KYKLOS, 51 (3). pp. 339-357. ISSN 0023-5962

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

In the early 80s economic theorists discovered strategic trade policy and thereby appeared to legitimise state support for domestic oligopolists threatened by international rivals. However, these self-same theorists had been long disposed towards free trade and thus found their new position uncomfortable. They soon began to back away and the argument has since gone full circle; the return of free trade as the favoured policy has been the outcome of theoretical, empirical and political analysis. We share the concerns of earlier literature but dispute the conclusion favouring free trade. We see the 'free' in free trade as freedom at a cost; it refers to the freedom of strategic decision-makers in transnational corporations to further their own objectives despite the resistance of others. It is therefore suggested that a policy favouring such trade is most appropriately labelled 'strategic trade' rather than 'free trade'! More importantly than labelling, however, our discussion suggests the desirability of public policy initiatives aimed at democratising strategic decisions concerning international trade. We define such initiatives as 'trade strategies'. It is recognised that these might include certain barriers to trade. Moreover, rather than supporting national champions and unlike mainstream strategic trade theory, our argument points to the potential provided by networks of smaller firms. Also unlike earlier strategic trade theory, we emphasise the evolution of a process where conflicts are recognised and addressed in a spirit of international cooperation.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
Journal or Publication Title: KYKLOS
Publisher: BLACKWELL PUBL LTD
ISSN: 0023-5962
Date: 1998
Volume: 51
Number: 3
Number of Pages: 19
Page Range: pp. 339-357
Publication Status: Published
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/15390

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us