Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Technology, organisation and productivity performance in services : lessons from Britain and the United States since 1870

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Broadberry, Stephen and Ghosal, Sayantan . (2005) Technology, organisation and productivity performance in services : lessons from Britain and the United States since 1870. Structural Change and Economic Dynamics, Vol.16 (No.4). pp. 437-466. ISSN 0954-349X

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Broadberry_Technology.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (230Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.strueco.2004.11.003

Abstract

This paper documents the comparative productivity performance of the United States and Britain since 1870, showing the importance of developments in services. We identify the transition in market services from customised, low-volume, high-margin business organised on a network basis to standardised, high-volume, low-margin business with hierarchical management, as a key factor. A model of the interaction between technology, organisation and economic performance is then provided, focusing on the transition from networks to hierarchies. Four general lessons are drawn: (1) developments in services must be analysed if the major changes in comparative productivity performance among nations are to be understood fully; (2) different technologies and organisational forms can co-exist efficiently; (3) technological change can cause difficulties of adjustment in technology-using sectors if it is not suited to the social capabilities of the society; (4) reversal of technological trends can lead to reversal of comparative productivity performance.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Macroeconomics, Industrial productivity, Economic development
Journal or Publication Title: Structural Change and Economic Dynamics
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0954-349X
Date: December 2005
Volume: Vol.16
Number: No.4
Page Range: pp. 437-466
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.strueco.2004.11.003
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Abramovitz, M. (1986), “Catching Up, Forging Ahead and Falling Behind”, Journal of Economic History, 46, 385-406. Anderson, G. (1976), Victorian Clerks, Manchester: Manchester University Press. Bain, G.S. and Price, R. (1980), Profiles of Union Growth: A Comparative Statistical Portrait of Eight Countries, Oxford: Blackwell. Bernard, A.B. and Jones, C.I. (1996), “Comparing Apples to Oranges: Productivity Convergence and Measurement Across Industries and Countries”, American Economic Review, 86, 1216-1238. Booth, A. (2001), The British Economy in the Twentieth Century, Basingstoke: Palgrave. Boyce, G. (1995), Information, Mediation and Institutional Development: The Rise of Large-Scale Enterprise in British Shipping, 1870-1919, Manchester: Manchester University Press. Braverman, H. (1974), Labor and Monopoly Capital: The Degradation of Work in the Twentieth Century, New York: Monthly Review Press. Broadberry, S.N. (1997a), The Productivity Race: British Manufacturing in International Perspective, 1850-1990, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Broadberry, S.N. (1997b), “Forging Ahead, Falling Behind and Catching-Up: A Sectoral Analysis of Anglo-American Productivity Differences, 1870-1990”, Research in Economic History, 17, 1-37. Broadberry, S.N. (1998), “How did the United States and Germany Overtake Britain? A Sectoral Analysis of Comparative Productivity Levels, 1870-1990”, Journal of Economic History, 58: 375-407. Broadberry, S.N. and Crafts, N.F.R. (1992), “Britain’s Productivity Gap in the 1930s: Some Neglected Factors”, Journal of Economic History, 52, 531-558. Broadberry, S.N. and Ghosal, S. (2002), “From the Counting House to the Modern Office: Explaining Anglo-American Productivity Differences in Services, 1870-1990”, Journal of Economic History, (forthcoming). Cain, P.J. (1980), “Private Enterprise or Public Utility? Output, Pricing and Investment on English and Welsh Railways, 1870-1914”, Journal of Transport History, (3rd series), 1, 9-28. Calomiris, C. (1995), “The Costs of Rejecting Universal Banking: American Finance in the German Mirror, 1870-1914”, in Lamoreaux, N.R. and Raff, D.M.G. (eds.), Coordination and Information: Historical Perspectives on the Organization of Enterprise, Chicago: Chicago University Press. Campbell-Kelly, M. (1992), “Large-scale Data Processing in the Prudential, 1850- 1930”, Accounting, Business and Financial History, 2, 117-139. Campbell-Kelly, M. (1994), “The Railway Clearing House and Victorian Data Processing”, in Bud-Frierman, L. (ed.), Information and Acumen: The Understanding and Use of Knowledge in Modern Business, London: Routledge, 51-74. Campbell-Kelly, M. (1998), “Data Processing and technological Change: The Post Office Savings Bank, 1861-1930”, Technology and Culture, 39, 1-32. Cassis, Y. (1994), City Bankers, 1890-1914, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Chandler, A.D., Jr. (1977), The Visible Hand: The Managerial Revolution in American Business, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press. Chandler, A.D. Jr. (1980), “The United States: Seedbed of Managerial Capitalism”, in Chandler, A.D. Jr. and Daems, H. (eds.), Managerial Hierarchies: Comparative Perspectives on the Rise of the Modern Industrial Enterprise, Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press, 9-40. Cortada, J.W. (1993), Before the Computer: IBM, NCR, Burroughs andRemington Rand and the Industry they Created, 1865-1956, Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press. Feinstein, C.H. (1972), National Income, Expenditure and Output of the United Kingdom, 1855-1965, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Field, A.J. (1996), “The Relative Productivity of American Distribution, 1869-1992”, Research in Economic History, 16, 1-37. Fishlow, A. (1966), “Productivity and Technological Change in the Railroad Sector, 1840-1910”, in Brady, D.S. (ed.), Output, Employment and Productivity in the United States After 1800, Studies in Income and Wealth Volume Thirty, New York: National Bureau of Economic Research and Columbia University Press. Foreman-Peck, J. and Millward, R. (1994), Public and Private Ownership of British Industry, 1820-1990, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Goldin, C. (1998), “America’s Graduation from High School: The Evolution and Spread of Secondary Schooling in the Twentieth Century”, Journal of Economic History, 58: 345-374. Goldin, C. (2001), “The Human-Capital Century and American Leadership: Virtues of the Past”, Journal of Economic History, 61, 263-292. Guerriero Wilson, R. (1998), Disillusionment or New Opportunities? The Changing Nature of Work in Offices, Glasgow 1880-1914, Aldershot: Ashgate. Hall, M., Knapp, J. and Winsten, C. (1961), Distribution in Great Britain and North America: A Study in Structure and Productivity, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Hannah, L. (1974), “Managerial Innovation and the Rise of the Large-Scale Company in Interwar Britain”, Economic History Review, 27(2), 252-270. Halsey, A.H. (ed.) (1988), Trends in British Society Since 1900: A Guide to the Changing Social Structure of Britain, (2nd edition), London: Macmillan. Hawke, G.R. (1970), Railways and Economic Growth in England and Wales, 1840- 1870, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Imlah, A.H. (1958), Economic Elements in the Pax Britannica: Studies in British Foreign Trade in the Nineteenth Century, New York: Russell & Russell. Jones, G. (1993), British Multinational Banking, 1830-1990, Oxford: Clarendon Press. Jones, G. (2000), Merchants to Multinationals: British Trading Companies in the Nineteenth and Twentieth Centuries, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Kynaston, D. (2001), The City of London, Volume IV: A Club No More, 1945-2000, London: Chatto & Windus. Lewchuk, W. (1987), American Technology and the British Vehicle Industry, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Lindert, P.H. (2001), “Democracy, Decentralization, and Mass Schooling Before 1914: Appendices”, Working Paper No.105, Agricultural History Center, University of California, Davis. Lockwood, D. (1958), The Blackcoated Worker: A Study in Class Consciousness, London: Allen and Unwin. McCloskey, D.N. (1990), If You’re So Smart: The Narrative of Economic Expertise, Chicago: University of Chicago Press. McCraw, T. (1996), “Competition and ‘Fair Trade’: History and Theory, Research in Economic History, 16, 185-239. Maddison, A. (1991), Dynamic Forces in Capitalist Development, Oxford: Oxford University Press. Maddison, A. (1995), Monitoring the World Economy, 1820-1992, Paris: Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development.Mitch, D.F. (1992), The Rise of Literacy in Victorian England: The Influence of Private Choice and Public Policy, Philadelphia, PA: University of Pennsylvania Press. Mitchell, B.R. (1988), British Historical Statistics, (second edition) Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. O’Mahony, M., Oulton, N., and Vass, J. (1998), “Market services: Productivity Benchmarks for the UK”, Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 60, 529-551. Ohkawa, K. and Rosovsky, H. (1973), Japanese Economic Growth: Trend Acceleration in the Twentieth Century, Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press. Perkins, E.J. (1999), Wall Street to Main Street: Charles Merrill and Middle-Class Investors, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Pryke, R. (1971), Public Enterprise in Practice: The British Experience of Nationalization over Two Decades, London: MacGibbon & Kee. Ringer, F.K. (1979), Education and Society in Modern Europe, Bloomington, IN: Indiana University Press. Rubinstein, W.D. (1993), Capitalism, Culture and Decline in Britain, 1750-1990, London: Routledge. Sabel, C. F. and Zeitlin, J. (eds.) (1997), World of Possibilities: Flexibility and Mass Production in Western Industrialization, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Sayers, R.S. (1976), The Bank of England, 1891-1944, (2 volumes + appendices), Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Smith, A.D., Hitchens, D.M.W.N. and Davies, S.W. (1982), International Industrial Productivity: A Comparison of Britain, America and Germany, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Tedlow, R. (1990), New and Improved: The Story of Mass Marketing in America, New York: Basic. Tyack, D.B. (1967), (ed.), Turning Points in American Educational History, Lexington, MA: Xerox. White, E. N. (2000), “Banking and Finance in the Twentieth Century”, in Engerman, S.L. and Gallman, R.E. (eds.), The Cambridge Economic History of the United States, Volume III: The Twentieth Century, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 743-802. Yates, J. (1989), Control through Communication: The Rise of System in American Management, Baltimore, MD: Johns Hopkins University Press
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/155

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us