Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

The effects of entry in bilateral oligopoly

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Naylor, Robin Andrew, 1959- (2002) The effects of entry in bilateral oligopoly. Working Paper. University of Warwick, Department of Economics, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Naylor_twerp638.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (72Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

We show that a firm’s profits under Cournot oligopoly can be increasing in the number of firms in the industry if wages are determined by (decentralised) bargaining in unionized bilateral oligopoly. The intuition for the result is that increased product market competition following an increase in the number of firms is mirrored by increased labor market rivalry which induces (profit-enhancing) wage moderation. Whether the product or labor market effect dominates depends both on the extent of union bargaining power and on the nature of union preferences. A corollary of the results derived is that if the upstream agents are firms rather than labor unions, then profits are always decreasing in the number of firms, as in the standard Cournot model. We also show that if bargaining is centralized then there is no wage moderation effect and wages are the same independent of the number of firms, as in the standard model with exogenous factor costs.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Oligopolies, Labor unions, Wage bargaining, Collective bargaining, Profit
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: 19 April 2002
Number: No.638
Number of Pages: 24
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Booth, A. L., 1995. “The economics of trade unions,” CUP, Cambridge. Bughin, J., 1999. The strategic choice of union-oligopoly bargaining agenda. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 17, 1029-1040. Calmfors, L. and Driffill, J., 1988. Bargaining structure, corporatism and macroeconomic policy, Economic Policy, 6, pp. 13-47. Dowrick, S.J., 1989. Union-oligopoly bargaining. Economic Journal 99, 1123-1142. Horn, H. and Wolinsky, A., 1988. Bilateral monopolies and incentives for merger. Rand Journal of Economics 19, 408-419. Moene, K. O., Wallerstein, M. and Hoel, M., 1993. Bargaining structure and economic performance, in Flanagan, R., Moene, K. O. and Wallerstein, M., (Eds), “Trade union behaviour, pay-bargaining and economic performance,” Clarendon Press, Oxford. Lindbeck, A. and Snower, D., 1988. “The insider-outsider theory of employment and unemployment,” MIT Press, Cambridge, Mass.. Naylor, R. A., 1999. Union wage strategies and international trade. Economic Journal 109, 102-125. Naylor, R. A., 2002. Industry profits and market size under bilateral oligopoly. Economics Letters, forthcoming. Seade, J., 1980a. On the effects of entry, Econometrica 48, pp. 479-489. Seade, J., 1980b. The stability of Cournot revisited. Journal of Economic Theory 23, pp. 15-27. Williamson, O. E., 1968. Wage rates as a barrier to entry: the Pennington case in perspective, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 82, pp. 85-116.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1552

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us