Wooders, Myrna Holtz and Berg, Hugo van den, 1968- (2001) The battle of the sexes over distribution of male surplus. Working Paper. University of Warwick, Department of Economics, Coventry.

Preview

PDF WRAP_Wooders_twerp610b.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader Download (107Kb)

Abstract

Female primates carry and nurse the fetus, and thus have the first responsibility for rearing the offspring. Assuming males are at least equally adept at obtaining food, males might either share surplus food with females or consume the food themselves. The distribution of the surplus is the subject of a battle of the sexes. If females succeed in obtaining a large share of the surplus, then there is little size dimorphism between males and females; otherwise males use the surplus themselves to become larger and stronger, and to engage in sexual competition with other males. Besides competing with males, females may compete with each other. Dependency may coincide with sexual competitiveness (sexiness). This paper introduces these ideas in a game theoretic setting and derives a simple bound on the male ‘sexiness’ required for a nonsupportive strategy to be worthwhile.

Item Type:	Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects:	Q Science > QA Mathematics H Social Sciences > HM Sociology
Divisions:	Faculty of Science > Mathematics Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Sex role, Sexual division of labor, Game theory, Evolution (Biology), Polygyny, Fathers
Series Name:	Warwick economic research papers
Publisher:	University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication:	Coventry
Date:	21 November 2001
Number:	No.610
Number of Pages:	11
Status:	Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version:	Open Access
References:	[1] Clutton-Brock, T. H. The evolution of parental care with original drawings by Princeton, NJ.; Oxford : Princeton University Press, 1991. [2] Dunbar, R. (1996) Gossip, Grooming and the Evolution of Language, Faber and Faber Ltd. London. [3] Dunbar, R. (1992) “Mating and parental care,” in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution, eds. S. Jones. R. Martin and D. Pilbean, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK., 150-152. [4] Fleagle, J.G. (1999) Primate Adaptaion and Evolution, Second Edition, Academic Press, San Diego/London/Boston/New York/Sydney/Tokyo/Toronto. [5] Gould, J.L. and C.G. Gould (1997) Sexual Selection; Mate Choice and Courtship in Nature, Scientific American Library, New York. [6] Hrdy, S.B. (1989) The Woman that Never Evolved, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusets and London, England. [7] Kaplan, H. and A.J. Robson (1999) “The co-evolution of human longevity and intelligence in hunter-gatherer economies,” typescript. [8] Landers, J. (1992) “Reconstructing ancient populations,” in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution, eds. S. Jones. R. Martin and D. Pilbean, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK., 402-405. [9] Mace, G. (1992) “Differences between the sexes,” in The Cambridge Encyclopedia of Human Evolution, eds. S. Jones. R. Martin and D. Pilbean, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. p. 52-55/ [10] Nunn, C.L., J. L. Gittleman and J. Antonovics (2000) “Promiscuity and the primate immune system,” Science November 10; 290: 1168-1170. [11] Siow, A. (1998) “Differential fecundity, markets and gender roles,” Journal of Political Economy, 106 (2), April 1998, 334-354.
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1575

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item