Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Learning in elections and voter turnout equilibria

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

DeMichelis, Stefano and Dhillon, Amrita (2001) Learning in elections and voter turnout equilibria. Working Paper. University of Warwick, Department of Economics, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_DeMichelis_twerp608.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (248Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

Both complete and incomplete game Theoretic Models of Voter Turnout (Palfrey and Rosenthal, 1983,1985) have the problem of multiple equilibria, some of which seem unreasonable. How can the counter intuitive high turnout equilibria be explained? Palfrey and Rosenthal (1985) suggest that the main reason is that strategic uncertainty istoo low in a complete information model. We show that this is not the main problem with these equilibria{ incomplete information may exacerbate the problem of multiple equilibria. We propose a very intuitive criterion based on voter learning to distinguish reasonable equilibria. This paper makes precise the sense in which the high turnout equilibria in the Palfrey-Rosenthal model are not robust. We show how the model can be used to qualitatively explain several phenomena observed in reality.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Voting reseach, Elections, Learning -- Mathematical models, Game theory
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: September 2001
Number: No.608
Number of Pages: 21
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: September 2001: Preliminary and incomplete
References: 1. Fudenberg, D and David K.Levine, (1998) \The theory of learning in Games", MIT Press. 2. Kandori,M., G.J.Mailath, and R.Rob (1993), Learning, Mutations and Long Run Equilibria in Games, Econometrica, Vol.61, No.1, pp.29{56. 3. Palfrey,T.R. and H. Rosenthal (1983), A strategic calculus of voting, Public Choice, 41, pp.7{53. 4. Palfrey,T.R. and H. Rosenthal (1985), Voter Participation and Strategic Uncertainty, The American Political Science Review, Vol.79, pp.62{78. 5. Weibull, J.(1995), \Evolutionary Game Theory", MIT Press.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1576

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us