The Library
Guided by the science (de)politicising the UK government’s response to the coronavirus crisis
Tools
Tools
Tools
Kettell, Steven and Kerr, Peter (2022) Guided by the science (de)politicising the UK government’s response to the coronavirus crisis. British Journal of Politics and International Relations, 24 (1). pp. 11-30. doi:10.1177/13691481211054957
|
PDF
WRAP-Guided-science-de-politicising-UK-governments-response-coronavirus-crisis-2021.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons: Attribution-Noncommercial 4.0. Download (287Kb) | Preview |
|
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-Guided-science-de-politicising-UK-governments-response-coronavirus-crisis-2021.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (509Kb) |
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177/13691481211054957
Abstract
This paper sets out to examine the politicising and depoliticising effects of the various stories that were deployed by the UK government in its response to the coronavirus crisis during its daily press briefings over a two-month period between 16th March and 16th May 2020. In doing so, we identify four key narratives: (1) unprecedented government activism, (2) working to plan, (3) national security, wartime unity and sacrifice and, (4) scientific guidance. Through a quantitative and qualitative study of the deployment of these narratives, we attempt to further recent theoretical insights on depoliticisation by noting that the COVID-19 crisis produced a particular type of crisis moment in which the government was forced to respond in ‘real time’ to a set of circumstances which were rapidly changing. As such, this made it much more difficult to control the various stories they wanted to tell and therefore find a coherent ‘anchor’ for their politicising and depoliticising strategies. This led to some deft discursive footwork as the government sought to pass the ball of responsibility between various groups of actors in order to rapidly and continually shift the balance between avoiding blame and taking credit.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | J Political Science > JA Political science (General) J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine > RA0421 Public health. Hygiene. Preventive Medicine |
||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies | ||||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020- -- Political aspects -- Great Britain, COVID-19 (Disease) -- Political aspects -- Great Britain, Government publicity -- Great Britain, Communication in politics -- Great Britain | ||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | British Journal of Politics and International Relations | ||||||||
| Publisher: | Sage Publications Ltd | ||||||||
| ISSN: | 1369-1481 | ||||||||
| Official Date: | 1 February 2022 | ||||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||||
| Volume: | 24 | ||||||||
| Number: | 1 | ||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 11-30 | ||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1177/13691481211054957 | ||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access | ||||||||
| Related URLs: |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
