Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Commentary on the use of the reproduction number R during the COVID-19 pandemic

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Vegvari, Carolin, Abbott, Sam, Ball, Frank, Brooks-Pollock, Ellen, Challen, Robert, Collyer, Benjamin S., Dangerfield, Ciara, Gog, Julia R., Gostic, Katelyn M., Heffernan, Jane M. et al.
(2021) Commentary on the use of the reproduction number R during the COVID-19 pandemic. Statistical Methods in Medical Research . 096228022110370. doi:10.1177/09622802211037079 (In Press)

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Commentary-use-reproduction-number-R-COVID-19-pandemic-2021.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1320Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1177%2F09622802211037079

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic, the reproduction number [Formula: see text] has become a popular epidemiological metric used to communicate the state of the epidemic. At its most basic, [Formula: see text] is defined as the average number of secondary infections caused by one primary infected individual. [Formula: see text] seems convenient, because the epidemic is expanding if [Formula: see text] and contracting if [Formula: see text]. The magnitude of [Formula: see text] indicates by how much transmission needs to be reduced to control the epidemic. Using [Formula: see text] in a naïve way can cause new problems. The reasons for this are threefold: (1) There is not just one definition of [Formula: see text] but many, and the precise definition of [Formula: see text] affects both its estimated value and how it should be interpreted. (2) Even with a particular clearly defined [Formula: see text], there may be different statistical methods used to estimate its value, and the choice of method will affect the estimate. (3) The availability and type of data used to estimate [Formula: see text] vary, and it is not always clear what data should be included in the estimation. In this review, we discuss when [Formula: see text] is useful, when it may be of use but needs to be interpreted with care, and when it may be an inappropriate indicator of the progress of the epidemic. We also argue that careful definition of [Formula: see text], and the data and methods used to estimate it, can make [Formula: see text] a more useful metric for future management of the epidemic.

Item Type: Journal Item
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Mathematics
SWORD Depositor: Library Publications Router
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020- , Viruses -- Reproduction, COVID-19 Pandemic, 2020-
Journal or Publication Title: Statistical Methods in Medical Research
Publisher: SAGE Publications
ISSN: 1477-0334
Official Date: 27 September 2021
Dates:
DateEvent
27 September 2021Published
Article Number: 096228022110370
DOI: 10.1177/09622802211037079
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: In Press
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
EP/R014604/1[EPSRC] Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266
MC/PC/19067[MRC] Medical Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000265
UNSPECIFIEDNational Institute for Health Researchhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000272
EP/N014391/1[EPSRC] Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000266
NHS Global Digital Exemplar programmeGreat Britain. National Health Service.http://viaf.org/viaf/147179369
UNSPECIFIED[NSERC] Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canadahttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000038
UNSPECIFIEDCanadian Institutes for Health Researchhttps://cihr-irsc.gc.ca/e/193.html
MAU1718Marsden Fundhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009193
CUP E83C18000100006Università degli Studi di Roma Tor Vergatahttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100007642
202562/Z/16/Z)Wellcome Trusthttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010269
202562/Z/16/Z)Royal Societyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000288
R01 AI116770National Institute of Allergy and Infectious DiseasesUNSPECIFIED
2016-04566Vetenskapsrådethttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004359
FellowshipJames S. McDonnell Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000913

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us