Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Computing power indices for large voting games

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Leech, Dennis (2002) Computing power indices for large voting games. Working Paper. Coventry: University of Warwick, Department of Economics. (Warwick economic research papers.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Leech_twerp_579.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (117Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

Voting Power Indices enable the analysis of the distribution of power in a legislature or voting body in which different members have different numbers of votes. Although this approach to the measurement of power, based on co-operative game theory, has been known for a long time its empirical application has been to some extent limited, in part by the difficulty of computing the indices when there are many players. This paper presents new algorithms for computing the classical power indices, those of Shapley and Shubik (1954) and of Banzhaf (1963), which are essentially modifications of approximation methods due to Owen, and have been shown to work well in real applications. They are of most utility in situations where both the number of players is large and their voting weights are very non-uniform, some members having considerably larger numbers of votes than others, where Owen's approximation methods are least accurate. The suggestion is made that the availability of such improved algorithms might stimulate further applied research in this field.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Voting reseach, Indexation (Economics), Power (Social sciences), Game theory, Information asymmetry
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: February 2002
Number: No.579
Number of Pages: 29
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: Revised February 2002
References: Banzhaf, John F (1965), “Weighted Voting Doesn’t Work: A Mathematical Analysis”, Rutgers Law Review, 19, 317-343 Coleman, James S (1971)., "Control of Collectivities and the Power of a Collectivity to Act," in B.Lieberman (ed), Social Choice, New York, Gordon and Breach, reprinted in J.S. Coleman, 1986, Individual Interests and Collective Action, Cambridge University Press. Dubey, P. and L.S. Shapley (1979), "Mathematical Properties of the Banzhaf Value," Mathematics of Operational Research, 4, 99-131. Felsenthal, Dan S. and Moshé Machover (1995), "Postulates and Paradoxes of Relative Voting Power: a Critical Re-Appraisal," Theory and Decision, 38,195-229. -----------------------------------, (1998),The Measurement of Voting Power, Cheltenham, Edward Elgar. -----------------------------------, and William.Zwicker( 1998), "The Bicameral Postulates and Indices of a Priori Voting Power," Theory and Decision, 44, 83-116. -----------------------------------, (2001), “The Treaty of Nice and Qualified Majority Voting,” Social Choice and Welfare, 19(3), 465-83. Holler, Manfred (1981), (Ed.), Power, Voting and Voting Power, Physica-Verlag, Wurtzburg. Lambert, J.P. (1988), "Voting Games, Power Indices and Presidential Elections," UMAP Journal, 9, 216-277. Lane, Jan-Erik and Sven Berg (1999), "Relevance of Voting Power", Journal of Theoretical Politics, 11(3), 309-19. La Porta, R., Florencio Lopez-de-Silanes, Andrei Shleifer and R.W. Vishny (1999), "Corporate Ownership around the World," Journal of Finance, 32(3), July, 1131-50. Leech, Dennis (1988) "The Relationship between Shareholding Concentration and Shareholder Voting Power in British Companies: a Study of the Application of Power Indices for Simple Games," Management Science, 34, 509-527. ----------------- (1992) "Empirical Analysis of the Distribution of a priori Voting Power: Some Results for the British Labour Party Conference and Electoral College", European Journal of Political Research, 21, 245-65. ----------------- (2001), "Shareholder Voting Power and Corporate Governance: a Study of Large British Companies," Nordic Journal of Political Economy, Vol. 27(1), 33-54. --------------- (2002) "An Empirical Comparison of the Performance of Classical Power Indices," Political Studies, vol. 50(1) March 2002,1-22. --------------- (forthcoming, a), “Designing the Voting System for the Council of the European Union,” Public Choice, forthcoming. [Also Center for the Study of Globalization and Regionalisation Working Papers, 75/01, University of Warwick.] --------------- (forthcoming, b), "Voting Power in the Governance of the International Monetary Fund", Annals of Operations Research, Special Issue on Game Practice (Guest-Editors: I. Garcia-Jurado, F. Patrone and S. Tijs), forthcoming. [Also Center for the Study of Globalization and Regionalisation Working Papers, 68/01, University of Warwick.] Lucas, William F. (1983), “Measuring Power in Weighted Voting Systems,” in S. Brams, W. Lucas and P. Straffin (eds.), Political and Related Models, Springer. Mann, Irving and Lloyd .S Shapley (1960), Values of Large Games IV: Evaluating the Electoral College by Montecarlo Techniques, RM-2651, The Rand Corporation, Santa Monica. -------------------------------- (1962), Values of Large Games VI: Evaluating the Electoral College Exactly, RM-3158, The Rand Corporation , Santa Monica. Nijenhuis, A. and H.S.Wilf (1983), Combinatorial Algorithms, Academic Press. Owen, Guillermo (1972), “Multilinear Extensions of Games,” Management Science, vol. 18(5), Part 2, P-64 to P-79. --------------------- (1975a), "Multilinear Extensions and the Banzhaf Value," Naval Research Logistics Quarterly, 22, 741-50. --------------------- (1975b), “Evaluation of a Presidential Election Game”, American Political Science Review, 69, 947-53. --------------------- (1995), Game Theory,(3rd Edition) , Academic Press. Patterson, T. N. L. (1968), “The Optimum Addition of Points to Quadrature Formulae,” Mathematics of Computation, 22, 847-56. Penrose, L.S. (1946), "The Elementary Statistics of Majority Voting," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, 109, 53-57. Shapley, Lloyd S. and Martin Shubik (1954), “A Method for Evaluating the Distribution of Power in a Committee System,” American Political Science Review, 48, 787-92. Straffin, Philip D. (1994), "Power and Stability in Politics," chapter 32 of Aumann, Robert J and Sergiu Hart (eds.), Handbook of Game Theory, Volume 2, North-Holland. Widgren, Mika (1994), "Voting Power in the EC Decision Making and the Consequences of Two Different Enlargements," European Economic Review, 38, 1153-1170. ------------------- (2000), “A Note on Matthias Sutter,” Journal of Theoretical Politics, 12(4), 451-4.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1599

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us