Assessing children's understanding of complex syntax : a comparison of two methods

Research output not available from this repository.

Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

We examined the effect of two methods of assessment—multiple-choice sentence–picture matching and an animated sentence-verification task—on typically developing children's understanding of relative clauses. A sample of children between the ages of 3 years 6 months and 4 years 11 months took part in the study (N = 103). Results indicated that (a) participants performed better on the sentence-verification than on the multiple-choice task independently of age, (b) each testing method revealed a different hierarchy of constructions, and (c) the impact of testing method on participants’ performance was greater for some constructions than others. Our results suggest that young children can understand complex sentences when they are presented in a manner that better reflects how people process language in natural discourse. These results have implications for the study of language comprehension in suggesting that results from multiple-choice tasks may not generalize to other methods.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Educational Development, Appraisal and Research (CEDAR)
Journal or Publication Title: Language Learning
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
ISSN: 0023-8333
Official Date: June 2019
Dates:
Date
Event
June 2019
Published
30 January 2019
Available
29 September 2018
Accepted
Volume: 69
Number: 2
Page Range: pp. 255-291
DOI: 10.1111/lang.12332
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
URI: https://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/160083/

Export / Share Citation


Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item