Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Asset ownership and investment incentives revisited

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

De Meza, David and Lockwood, Ben (2000) Asset ownership and investment incentives revisited. Working Paper. University of Warwick, Department of Economics, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_De_Meza_twerp562.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (132Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/economics/resear...

Abstract

Previous work on the property rights theory of the firm suggests that in the presence of outside options, asset ownership may demotivate managers. This paper shows that this conclusion relies on the assumption that a manager’s outside option only depends on her own investment. In many cases, an asset owner has the opportunity to continue with a project even if the team breaks up. The investments of non-owners may then be devalued, but are typically not wholly lost to the owner. This weakens the bargaining power of the non-owner. So, in the presence of cross effects, outside options do not necessarily overturn the property of the original Grossman-Hart-Moore model that an asset transfer may motivate the gainer and demotivate the loser.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HF Commerce
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Assets (Accounting), Investments, Right of property, Motivation (Psychology)
Series Name: Warwick economic research papers
Publisher: University of Warwick, Department of Economics
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: May 2000
Number: No.562
Number of Pages: 28
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: First version, January 1999; this version May 2000
References: Binmore,K, A.Shaked, and J.Sutton (1989), “An outside option experiment”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 104, 753-770 Chandler, A.D.(1977) ”The Visible Hand; The Managerial Revolution in American Business” Belknap Press, Cambridge, Mass Chiu, Y.S. (1998) ”Noncooperative Bargaining, Hostages and Optimal Asset Ownership” American Economic Review, 88, 882-901 De Meza,D. and B.Lockwood(1998), “Does Asset Ownership Always Motivate Managers? Outside Options and The Property Rights Theory of the Firm”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, 113, 361-386 Grossman,S.J., and O.Hart (1986), “The costs and bene…ts of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration”, Journal of Political Economy, 94, 691-719 Hart,O.(1995), Firms, Contracts, and Financial Structure, Oxford University Press Hart,O., and J.Moore (1990), “Property rights and the nature of the …rm”, Journal of Political Economy, 98, 1119-1158 Noldeke, G. and K. Schmidt (1998) ”Sequential Investments and Options to Own” Rand Journal of Economics, Winter, vol.29 (4) 633-653. Peters,T and R.H.Waterman (1982) ”In Search of Excellence” Harper Collins Sutton,J.(1986), “Non-cooperative bargaining theory: an introduction”, Review of Economic Studies, 53, 709-724
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1615

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us