The Library
The impact of experience on decisions based on pre-choice samples and the face-or-cue hypothesis
Tools
Tools
Tools
Erev, Ido, Yakobi, Ofir, Ashby, Nathaniel J. S. and Chater, Nick (2022) The impact of experience on decisions based on pre-choice samples and the face-or-cue hypothesis. Theory and Decision, 92 . pp. 583-598. doi:10.1007/s11238-021-09856-7
![[img]](http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/style/images/fileicons/application_pdf.png) |
PDF
WRAP-impact-experience-decisions-on-pre-choice-samples-face-or-cue-hypothesis-2022.pdf - Accepted Version Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only until 15 January 2023. Contact author directly, specifying your specific needs. - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (744Kb) |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11238-021-09856-7
Abstract
The growing literature on how people learn to make decisions based on experience focuses on two types of paradigms. In one paradigm, people are faced with a choice, and must retrospectively consult past experience of similar choices to decide what to do. In the other paradigm, people are faced with a choice, and then have the opportunity prospectively to gather new experiences that might help them make that choice. The current paper examines the joint impact of both retrospective and prospective experiences. Two experiments reveal strong interactions. In Study 1, repeated experience with new samples appears to reduce sensitivity to the average outcome in the samples and enhances underweighting of rare events. Study 2 shows that repeated experience with pre-choice samples can reverse the impact of the new information (and decrease the tendency to select the alternative that provides the best outcome in the new sample). The results suggest that prospectively gathering new samples can have two, potentially contrasting, influences on choice: the first focuses on the sample’s face value and selects the option with the higher value in the new sample; by contrast, the second treats the new sample as a cue to recall similar prior experiences, which in turn drive choice. The paper concludes with a discussion of the possibility that part of the descriptive value of prospect theory reflects the fact that it summarizes the joint impact of similar “face-or-cue” processes.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | |||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor H Social Sciences > HM Sociology |
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Decision making , Choice (Psychology), Social choice , Public opinion , Human behavior, Reasoning (Psychology) | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Theory and Decision | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Publisher: | Springer Netherlands | |||||||||||||||||||||
| ISSN: | 0040-5833 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Official Date: | April 2022 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Dates: |
|
|||||||||||||||||||||
| Volume: | 92 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Page Range: | pp. 583-598 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11238-021-09856-7 | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Publication Status: | Published | |||||||||||||||||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | |||||||||||||||||||||
| RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
