Chan, William (2021) Towards a democratic-sortitional meritocracy : reflections on the democracy-meritocracy debate. PhD thesis, University of Warwick.

Preview

PDF WRAP_Theses_Chan_2021.pdf - Submitted Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Download (1429Kb) | Preview

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

This thesis investigates the arguments of the political meritocrats, such as Daniel A. Bell, Tongdong Bai, Joseph Chan, Ruiping Fan and Qing Jiang. The political meritocrats argue that core positions of political authority should be allocated by merit rather than popular elections, because contemporary democratic politics is deficient in many ways. To that end, they argue, the democratically elected officials of the core executive and/or legislature should be constrained if not replaced by some meritocratically selected officials. Their proposed merit-based mechanisms for selecting public officials include, for example, examinations, interviews, peer recommendations and assessments of bureaucratic performance. This thesis has three aims. First, contra the political meritocrats, I argue that an individual might not merit political power, even when she has some personal attributes helpful for improving political decision-making quality. Second, in line with the political meritocrats, I argue that a political system need not distribute political power equally to be morally justified, at least when we focus on some familiar conceptions of equality, stability and acceptability underpinning democratic arrangements. Third, pace the political meritocrats, I defend the democratic-sortitional model of meritocracy. The model envisions a core legislature composed of two chambers, the first elected, and the second meritocratically selected. Unlike the existing models of meritocracy, however, those occupying the meritocratic chamber of the democratic-sortitional model are chosen by sortition. The democratic chamber is responsible for designing the eligibility criteria for the meritocratic chamber, according to citizens’ deliberative conclusions on what skills, expertise, interests and so on merit political representation. Interested citizens fulfilling those criteria will be randomly selected for the meritocratic chamber. This thesis will not just enhance our understanding of various conceptual and normative issues related to the idea of political meritocracy, but it will also shed light on how meritocratic political systems should be evaluated and designed.

Item Type:	Thesis (PhD)
Subjects:	J Political Science > JC Political theory J Political Science > JF Political institutions (General)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Merit (Ethics) -- Political aspects, Democracy, Authority, Representative government and representation, Nominations for office, Officials and employees -- Selection and appointment, Legitimacy of governments
Official Date:	1 October 2021
Dates:	Date Event 1 October 2021 Submitted
Institution:	University of Warwick
Theses Department:	Department of Politics and International Studies
Thesis Type:	PhD
Publication Status:	Unpublished
Supervisor(s)/Advisor:	Clayton, Matthew, 1966- ; Saward, Michael, 1960- ; Williams, Andrew, 1963-
Sponsors:	University of Warwick. Department of Politics and International Studies
Format of File:	pdf
Extent:	v, 220 leaves
Language:	eng

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item

Downloads