Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Bounded Hanoi

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Iwama, Kazuo and Paterson, Mike (2022) Bounded Hanoi. The American Mathematical Monthly, 129 (4). pp. 303-319. doi:10.1080/00029890.2022.2026166 ISSN 1930-0972.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-Bounded-Hanoi-22.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (730Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1080/00029890.2022.2026166

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The classic Tower of Hanoi puzzle involves moving a set of disks on three pegs. The number of moves required for a given number of disks is easy to determine, but when the number of pegs is increased to four or more, this becomes more challenging. After 75 years, the answer for four pegs was resolved only recently, and this time complexity question remains open for five or more pegs. In this article, the space complexity, i.e., how many disks need to be accommodated on the pegs involved in the transfer, is considered for the first time. Suppose m disks are to be transferred from some peg L to another peg R using k intermediate work pegs of heights j1,…,jk, then how large can m be? We denote this value by H(j1,…,jk). If k = 1, as in the classic problem, the answer is easy: H(j)=j+1. We have the exact value for two work pegs, but so far only very partial results for three or more pegs. For example, H(10!,10!)=26336386137601 and H(0!,1!,2!,…,10!)=16304749471397, but we still do not know the value for H(1,3,3).

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QA Mathematics
Q Science > QA Mathematics > QA76 Electronic computers. Computer science. Computer software
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Computer Science
SWORD Depositor: Library Publications Router
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Mathematical recreations , Computer algorithms , Computer software., Sequences (Mathematics), Combinatorial analysis, Graph theory
Journal or Publication Title: The American Mathematical Monthly
Publisher: Informa UK Limited
ISSN: 1930-0972
Official Date: 29 March 2022
Dates:
DateEvent
29 March 2022Published
5 May 2022Accepted
Volume: 129
Number: 4
Page Range: pp. 303-319
DOI: 10.1080/00029890.2022.2026166
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 16 November 2022
Date of first compliant Open Access: 16 November 2022
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
UNSPECIFIED[MEXT] Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technologyhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001700
UNSPECIFIEDCentre for Discrete Mathematics and its Applications, University of WarwickUNSPECIFIED

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us