The Library
Breaking the right way : a closer look at how we dissolve commitments
Tools
Tools
Tools
Chennells, Matthew and Michael, John (2022) Breaking the right way : a closer look at how we dissolve commitments. Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences . doi:10.1007/s11097-022-09805-x ISSN 1568-7759. (In Press)
|
PDF
WRAP-Breaking-the-right-way-a-closer-look-at-how-we-dissolve-commitments-Chennells-22.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer. Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0. Download (895Kb) | Preview |
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11097-022-09805-x
Abstract
Joint action enables us to achieve our goals more efficiently than we otherwise could, and in many cases to achieve goals that we could not otherwise achieve at all. It also presents us with the challenge of determining when and to what extent we should rely on others to make their contributions. Interpersonal commitments can help with this challenge – namely by reducing uncertainty about our own and our partner’s future actions, particularly when tempting alternative options are available to one or more parties. How we know whether a commitment is in place need not, however, be based on an explicit, identifiable event; in many cases, joint action is stabilized by individuals’ experience of an implicit sense of commitment, which is sensitive to subtle situational cues such as the effort costs invested by one or more agents. While an emerging body of work has investigated the conditions under which a sense of commitment may emerge and/or be strengthened, little attention has been paid to the conditions under which people are comfortable dissolving commitments. Specifically, what are the factors that modulate people’s motivation and which determine whether circumstances merit the dissolution of a commitment? After evaluating and rejecting the answers to this question suggested by standard approaches to commitment, we develop a new approach. The core insight which we articulate and defend is that, when considering whether new information or changing circumstances merit the dissolution of a commitment, people virtually bargain with their partners, performing a simulation of a bargaining process with the other person, including imagining how the other will feel and act towards them, and what effect this will have on them. The output of this simulation is a consciously accessible, affective state which provides motivation either to dissolve the commitment or to persist in it. Overall, our account expands our understanding of the phenomenology of being motivated to act committed in joint activity, an area in which existing accounts of interpersonal commitment fall short.
| Item Type: | Journal Article | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Subjects: | B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology | ||||||
| Divisions: | Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy | ||||||
| Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): | Commitment (Psychology), Social choice, Self-realization, Social norms | ||||||
| Journal or Publication Title: | Phenomenology and the Cognitive Sciences | ||||||
| Publisher: | Springer | ||||||
| ISSN: | 1568-7759 | ||||||
| Official Date: | 14 April 2022 | ||||||
| Dates: |
|
||||||
| Number of Pages: | 23 | ||||||
| DOI: | 10.1007/s11097-022-09805-x | ||||||
| Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||
| Publication Status: | In Press | ||||||
| Access rights to Published version: | Open Access (Creative Commons) | ||||||
| Date of first compliant deposit: | 3 May 2022 | ||||||
| Date of first compliant Open Access: | 4 May 2022 | ||||||
| RIOXX Funder/Project Grant: |
|
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
 |
View Item |
Downloads
Downloads per month over past year
