Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Predicting tail-biting from behaviour of pigs prior to outbreaks

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Statham, Poppy, Green, Laura E., Bichard, Meggie and Mendl, M. (Michael). (2009) Predicting tail-biting from behaviour of pigs prior to outbreaks. Applied Animal Behaviour Science, Vol.121 (No.3-4). pp. 157-164. ISSN 0168-1591

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Medley_0380313-lf-210711-tail_biting_-_predicting_outbreaks_-_statham_et_al_-_manuscript.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (237Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.applanim.2009.09.011

Abstract

Predicting that an outbreak of tail-biting is going to Occur in a group of pigs would be a useful tool for farmers. In a prospective longitudinal study, 24 groups of c.30 unclocked pigs were followed from birth to slaughter weight. Four groups had to be excluded from the analysis, the remaining groups were classified as having No Outbreak(n = 6), Underlying Outbreak (n = 8)or Severe Outbreak (n = 6) of tail-biting. The hypotheses examined were that Pigs Would be more active, perform more tail-orientated behaviours, or have their tails tucked under their body more in groups that went on to have outbreaks than in those that did not. Direct observations were made at 7, 11, 15 and 19 weeks of age and video recordings were examined for the 4 days prior to an Outbreak. All outbreaks Occurred after the behavioural observation at I I weeks of age. Activity levels were significantly higher in Severe Outbreak groups in the 4 days prior to an Outbreak, with more pigs Standing (p < 0.05) and significantly fewer pigs Sitting (p < 0.05) or Lying Inactive (p < 0.05) than in matched control groups. Comparisons of the Severe, Underlying and No Outbreak groups at 7 and 11 weeks of age, prior to any outbreaks, showed no difference in activity levels. However, at these ages, levels of Tail Interest were higher in No Outbreak groups than in those with Severe Outbreaks (p < 0.05), while the opposite was true for damaging Tail-Biting (p < 0.05). Thus high levels of damaging Tail-Biting may be a good predictor of impending outbreaks, but high levels of Tail Interest are not. Tail position also differed between groups at this age, with fewer Tails Tucked Under in No Outbreak groups (p < 0.01). Some outbreaks were predicted by multiple variables, while others had no clear predictors. In five outbreaks a small runty pig was tail bitten in the absence of a full outbreak. Whenever this happened, a full tail-biting outbreak always went on to take place sometime afterwards. The occurrence of single tail-biting events may thus be reliable indicators of future Outbreaks. In summary, measurement of pig activity has potential for predicting tail biting outbreaks on commercial farms as do levels of tails tucked under and damaging tail contact. Further work is needed to understand the relationship between different forms of tail contact and tail-biting. We highlight the difficulty in predicting all outbreaks from a single measure and conclude that tail-biting outbreaks vary considerably. The presence of an 'indicator pig' might be a useful sign that an outbreak will occur.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: S Agriculture > SF Animal culture
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Biological Sciences ( -2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Swine -- Wounds and injuries, Swine -- Behavior, Aggressive behavior in animals
Journal or Publication Title: Applied Animal Behaviour Science
Publisher: Elsevier Science BV
ISSN: 0168-1591
Date: December 2009
Volume: Vol.121
Number: No.3-4
Number of Pages: 8
Page Range: pp. 157-164
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.applanim.2009.09.011
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Sixth Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP6)
Grant number: FOOD-CT-2004-506508 (FP6)
References: Beattie, V.E., Breuer, K., O'Connell, N.E., Sneddon, I.A., Mercer, J.T., Rance, K.A., Sutcliffe, M.E.M., Edwards, S.A., 2005. Factors identifying pigs predisposed to tail biting. Anim. Sci. 80, 307-312. Beattie, V.E., O'Connell, N.E., Moss, B.W., 2000. Influence of environmental enrichment on the behaviour, performance and meat quality of domestic pigs. Livest. Prod. Sci. 65, 71-79. Field, A., 2000. Discovering Statistics using SPSS for Windows. Sage Publications. Fraser, D., 1987. Attraction To Blood As A Factor In Tail-Biting By Pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 17, 61-68. Fraser, D., Broom, D.M., 2005. Farm Animal Behaviour and Welfare. CABI Publishing. Fraser, D., Phillips, P.A., Thompson, B.K., Tennessen, T., 1991. Effect Of Straw On The Behavior Of Growing Pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 30, 307-318. Keeling, L., Bracke, M.B.M., Larsen, A., 2004. Who tailbites and who doesn't in groups of fattening pigs?, Proceedings of the 38th International Congress of the ISAE, Helsinki. McGlone, J.J., Sells, J., Harris, S., Hurst, R.J., 1990. Cannibalism in growing pigs: Effects of tail docking and housing system on behaviour, performance and immune function, Agric. Sci. Tech. Report No. T-5-283, Texas Tech University, pp. 69-71. McIntyre, J., 2003. Tail biting in pigs, Ph.D. Thesis, University of Newcastle, Newcastle, UK. Ruiterkamp, W.A., 1985. Het gedrag van mestvarkens in relatie tot huisvesting (The behaviour of grower pigs in relation to housing systems), Ph.D. Thesis, Utrecht University, The Netherlands. Sambraus, H.H., 1985. Mouth-based anomalous syndromes. World Anim. Sci., 391-422. Schrøder-Petersen, D.L., Simonsen, H.B., Lawson, L.G., 2003. Tail-in-mouth behaviour among weaner pigs in relation to age, gender and group composition regarding gender. Acta Agric. Scand. Sect. A - Anim. Sci. 53, 29-34. Statham, P., 2008. Effects of experience and individuality on tail-biting in pigs, PhD Thesis, University of Bristol. Svendsen, J., Olsson, A.C., Botermans, J., 2006. Data on tailbiting in pigs, Proceedings of the 19th IPVS Congress, Copenhagen, Denmark, p. 613. Van de Weerd, H.A., Docking, C.M., Day, J.E.L., Breuer, K., Edwards, S.A., 2006. Effects of species-relevant environmental enrichment on the behaviour and productivity of finishing pigs. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 99, 230-247. van Putten, G., 1969. An investigation into tail-biting among fattening pigs. Br. Vet. J. 125, 511-516. Zonderland, J.J., Wolthuis-Fillerup, M., van Reenen, C.G., Bracke, M.B.M., Kemp, B., Hartog, L.A.d., Spoolder, H.A.M., 2008. Prevention and treatment of tail biting in weaned piglets. Appl. Anim. Behav. Sci. 110, 269-281.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/16742

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us