The Library
Head‐to‐head comparison between recommendations by the ESC and ACC / AHA / HFSA heart failure guidelines
Tools
Bayés‐Genís, Antoni, Aimo, Alberto, Metra, Marco, Anker, Stefan, Seferovic, Petar, Rapezzi, Claudio, Castiglione, Vincenzo, Núñez, Julio, Emdin, Michele, Rosano, Giuseppe and Coats, Andrew J. S. (2022) Head‐to‐head comparison between recommendations by the ESC and ACC / AHA / HFSA heart failure guidelines. European Journal of Heart Failure, 24 (6). pp. 916-926. doi:10.1002/ejhf.2542
Research output not available from this repository.
Request-a-Copy directly from author or use local Library Get it For Me service.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2542
Abstract
Recommendations represent the core messages of guidelines, and are particularly important when the body of scientific evidence is rapidly growing, as in the case of heart failure (HF). The main messages from two latest major HF guidelines, endorsed by the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the American College of Cardiology/American Heart Association/Heart Failure Society of America (ACC/AHA/HFSA), are partially overlapping, starting from the four pillars of treatment for HF with reduced ejection fraction. Some notable differences exist, in part related to the timing of recent publications (most notably, the Universal Definition of HF paper and the EMPEROR-Preserved trial), and in part reflecting differing views of the natural history of HF (with a clear differentiation between stages A and B HF in the ACC/AHA/HFSA guidelines). Different approaches are proposed to specific issues such as risk stratification and implantable cardioverter defibrillator use for primary prevention in HFrEF patients with non-ischaemic aetiology. The ACC/AHA/HFSA guidelines put a greater emphasis on some issues that are particularly relevant to the US setting, such as the cost-effectiveness of therapies and the impact of health disparities on HF care. A comparison between guideline recommendations may give readers a deeper understanding of the ESC and ACC/AHA/HFSA guidelines, and help them apply sensible approaches to their own practice, wherever that may be in the world. A comparison may possibly also help further harmonization of recommendations between future guidelines, by identifying why some areas have led to conflicting recommendation, even when ostensibly reviewing the same published evidence.
Item Type: | Journal Item | ||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Divisions: | Administration > University Executive Office Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School |
||||||||||
Journal or Publication Title: | European Journal of Heart Failure | ||||||||||
Publisher: | John Wiley & Sons Ltd. | ||||||||||
ISSN: | 1388-9842 | ||||||||||
Official Date: | June 2022 | ||||||||||
Dates: |
|
||||||||||
Volume: | 24 | ||||||||||
Number: | 6 | ||||||||||
Page Range: | pp. 916-926 | ||||||||||
DOI: | 10.1002/ejhf.2542 | ||||||||||
Status: | Peer Reviewed | ||||||||||
Publication Status: | Published | ||||||||||
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): | This is the peer reviewed version of the following article: Bayés-Genís, A., Aimo, A., Metra, M., Anker, S., Seferovic, P., Rapezzi, C., Castiglione, V., Núñez, J., Emdin, M., Rosano, G. and Coats, A.J. (2022), Head-to-head comparison between recommendations by the ESC and ACC/AHA/HFSA heart failure guidelines. Eur J Heart Fail, 24: 916-926. https://doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2542, which has been published in final form at http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/ejhf.2542. This article may be used for non-commercial purposes in accordance with Wiley Terms and Conditions for Use of Self-Archived Versions. This article may not be enhanced, enriched or otherwise transformed into a derivative work, without express permission from Wiley or by statutory rights under applicable legislation. Copyright notices must not be removed, obscured or modified. The article must be linked to Wiley’s version of record on Wiley Online Library and any embedding, framing or otherwise making available the article or pages thereof by third parties from platforms, services and websites other than Wiley Online Library must be prohibited | ||||||||||
Access rights to Published version: | Restricted or Subscription Access | ||||||||||
Copyright Holders: | European Society of Cardiology |
Request changes or add full text files to a record
Repository staff actions (login required)
View Item |