The Library

Regional and sectoral varieties of capitalism

Tools

Crouch, Colin, Schröder, Martin and Voelzkow, Helmut. (2009) Regional and sectoral varieties of capitalism. Economy and Society, Vol.38 (No.4). pp. 654-678. ISSN 0308-5147

Preview

PDF
WRAP-Crouch_regional.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Download (436Kb)

Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/03085140903190383

Abstract

This study seeks to go beneath the generalizations that constitute characterizations of national economies in order to examine local and sectoral diversity - in particular, forms of capitalist organization at the level of localized sectors. It reports on the findings of research based on detailed case histories of local economies in four different types of production: modernized craft manufacturing (furniture), mass production (motor vehicles), high-technology production (biopharmaceuticals) and high-tech services (television film-making). In each case a local economy in Germany (usually seen counter-factually as an example of a particularly national system) was compared with one elsewhere in Europe: respectively, southern Sweden, Hungary (compared with eastern Germany) and the UK (for two studies).

In the analysis, companies act rationally in response to sector-specific challenges, being partly bound by the existing institutional framework that they encounter, but partly acting to alter it. Two possibilities are distinguished and found in the cases. In the first (structurally conservative) case, arrangements of governance in the national innovation and production system prove to be beneficial for the companies and their aim to stand up to international competition. Insofar as national institutions help companies to deal with competition on their markets, they will probably try to preserve these arrangements. In the second (innovative) case, companies turn away from the national context and develop their own local governance structure. If the national institutional structure is seen as not adequate or 'non-fitting' to deal with sectorally specific terms of competition, then the internal and external coordination of companies - in reaction to challenges posed by the market - is likely to deviate from the national structure. In some instances evidence of 'creative incoherence', where local deviation from the national model provides a creative impulse, is found.

Item Type:

Journal Article

Subjects:

H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions

Divisions:

Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > International Centre for Governance & Public Management
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School

Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):

Capitalism, Industrial organization (Economic theory), Industries -- Germany, Industries -- Europe, Germany -- Economic conditions, Europe -- Economic conditions

Journal or Publication Title:

Economy and Society

Publisher:

Routledge Journals, Taylor and Fancis Ltd

ISSN:

0308-5147

Official Date:

2009

Dates:

Date	Event
2009	Published

Volume:

Vol.38

Number:

No.4

Number of Pages:

Page Range:

pp. 654-678

Identification Number:

10.1080/03085140903190383

Status:

Peer Reviewed

Publication Status:

Published

Access rights to Published version:

Open Access

References:

Brose, H.-G. and Voelzkow, H. (eds.) (1999): Institutioneller Kontext wirtschaftlichen Handelns und Globalisierung. Marburg: Metropolis.
Casper, S. (2002): „National Institutional Frameworks and High-Technology in Germany: The Case of Biotechnology‟. In: Hollingsworth, J. R., Müller, K., and Hollingsworth, E. (eds.): Advancing Socio-Economics: An Institutionalist Perspective. Lanham: Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, 277-305.
_____ and Kettler, H. (2001): „National Institutional Frameworks and the Hybridization of Entrepreneurial Business Models: The German and UK Biotechnology Sectors‟. In: Industry and Innovation, 8, 1: 5-30.
Crouch, C. (2005): Capitalist Diversity and Change: Recombinant Governance and Institutional Entrepreneurs. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
_____ and Farrell, H. (2004): „Breaking the path of institutional development? Alternatives to the new determinism‟. In: Rationality and Society, 16/1: 5-43.
_____, Le Galès, P., Trigilia, C., and Voelzkow, H. (eds.) (2001): Local Production Systems in Europe: Rise or Demise? Oxford: Oxford University Press.
_____, _____, _____, and _____ (2004): Changing Governance of Local Economies: Response of European Local Production Systems. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
_____ and Voelzkow, H. (2008): Innovation in Local Economies: Germany in Comparative Context. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Deeg, R., Jackson, G. (2007): 'The State of the Art: Towards a More Dynamic Theory of Capitalist Variety', Socio-Economic Review, 5, 149-179.
Elbing, S. (2006): „Film- and TV-Production in London: A Coordinated Local Economy in a Liberal Environment?‟ In Voelzkow, Crouch, and Leuenberger (eds), q.v., 253-94.
Elbing, S. and Voelzkow, H. (2006a): ‚„Good Regional Governance“ der Film- und Fernsehproduktion in London und Köln: Überraschende Gemeinsamkeiten in unterschiedlichen nationalen Umwelten‟. In: Kleinfeld, R./ Plamper/ Huber (Hrsg.), Regional Governance, Band 2: Steuerung, Koordination und Kommunikation in regionalen Netzwerken als neue Form des Regierens. Osnabrück: Universitätsverlag Osnabrück, 83-97.
Elbing, S. and Voelzkow, H. (2006b): ‚Marktkonstitution und Regulierung der unabhängigen Film- und Fernsehproduktion – Staat, Verbände und Gewerkschaften im deutsch-britischen Vergleich‟. In: Industrielle Beziehungen 13 (4), 314-339.
Glassmann, U. (2006a): „Rule-breaking and freedom of rules in national production models: How German Capitalism Departs from the “Rhenish Equilibrium”‟. In Voelzkow, Crouch, and Leuenberger (eds), q.v., 30-69.
_____ (2006b): „Beyond the German Model of Capitalism: Unorthodox Local Business Development in the Cologne Media Industry’. In Voelzkow, Crouch, and Leuenberger (eds), q.v., 220-252.
_____ (forthcoming): „Beyond the German Model of Capitalism: Unorthodox Local Business Development in the Cologne Media Industry’, European Planning Studies.
Grabher, G. 2002: „The Project Ecology of Advertising: Tasks, Talents and Teams‟. In: Regional Studies 36 (3), 245-262.
Hall, P. and Soskice, D. (2001a): „Introduction‟. In: Hall and Soskice (eds.) (2001b), q.v., 1-68
_____ and _____ (eds.) (2001b): Varieties of Capitalism: The Institutional Foundations of Comparative Advantage. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
_____ and Thelen, K. (2005): „Institutional Change in Varieties of Capitalism‟. Paper prepared for presentation to the International Sociological Association, Research Committee 19 Annual Conference, Chicago, Illinois, September 8, 2005.
Hollingsworth, J. R., Schmitter, P. C., and Streeck, W. (1994): Governing Capitalist Economies: Performance and Control of Economic Sectors. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Jong, S. (2006): „The Development of Munich and Cambridge Therapeutic Biotech Firms: A Case Study of Institutional Adaptation‟. In Voelzkow, Crouch, and Leuenberger (eds), q.v., 295-315.
_____ (2007) „The Birth, Dispersion, and Adaptation of New Institutions across Institutional Systems: A Study of the Emergence and Performance of Biotech Firms and Technology Transfer Officers in and around Publicly Funded Research Centres in Three Regions‟. PhD thesis, Florence: European University Institute.
Kenney, M. (2000) (ed.), Understanding Silicon Valley: The Anatomy of an Entrepreneurial Region, Stanford: Stanford University Press.
Keune, M. and Tóth, A. (2006): ‘From Cathedral in the Desert to Institutional Entrepreneur: the Case of Audi in Győr, Hungary‟. In Voelzkow, Crouch, and Leuenberger (eds), q.v., 184-219.
_____, with Kiss, J. and Tóth, A. (2004) Innovation, Actors and Path Dependency: Change and Continuity in Local Development Policy in two Hungarian Regions, International Journal for Urban and Regional Research Vol 28, No. 3, September 2004: 586-600.
Kjær, P. (1996): The Constitution of Enterprise: An Institutional History of Inter-Firm Relations in Swedish Furniture Manufacturing. Stockholm: Stockholm University.
Lange, K. (2005): ‚Deutsche Biotech-Unternehmen und ihre Innovationsfähigkeit im internationalen Vergleich‟. In: Max-Planck-Institut für Gesellschaftsforschung, Tätigkeitsbericht 2005, 239-243.
Lange, K. (2006): ‚Deutsche Biotech-Unternehmen und ihre Innovationsfähigkeit im internationalen Vergleich – eine institutionentheoretische Analyse.‟ PhD thesis, Reichsuniversität Groningen.
Lundvall, B.-A. (1992): National Systems of Innovation: Towards a Theory of Innovation and Interactive Learning. London: Pinter Publishers.
Nelson, R. R. (1993): National Innovation Systems: A Comparative Analysis. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
_____and Winter, S. G. (1982): An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change. Cambridge (Mass.): Harvard University Press.
Piotti, G. (2004-05): „Industria automobilistica e processi si cooperazione locale: il caso di Zwickau‟, Sviluppo Locale, XI, 25: 31-48.
_____ (2006): „Testing the German Model in Eastern Germany: the Case of the Automobile Industry in Zwickau‟. In Voelzkow, Crouch, and Leuenberger (eds), q.v., 162-183.
Pontusson, J. (1997) „Between Neo-Liberalism and the German Model: Swedish Capitalism in Transition‟. In Crouch and Streeck (eds.), Political Economy of Modern Capitalism: Mapping Convergence and Diversity. London, Sage, 55-70.
Porter, M. (1990): The Competitive Advantage of Nations. New York: Free Press.
Rhodes, M. and Van Apeldoorn, B. (1997): „The Transformation of West European Capitalism?‟ Working Paper, Robert Schuman Centre. Florence: European University Institute.
Saxenian, A. (1999): Silicon Valley's New Immigrant Entrepreneurs. San Francisco: Public Policy Institute of California.
Scharpf, F. (1997): Games Real Actors Play: Actor-Centred Institutionalism in Policy Research. Boulder, CL: Westview.
Schmidt, V. (2002): The Futures of European Capitalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Sjöberg, Ö. and Rafiqui, P. (2006): „Spatial differentiation in national production systems: The case of the furniture industry in Sweden‟. In Voelzkow, Crouch, and Leuenberger (eds), q.v., 109–161.
Streeck, W. (1992): „Productive Constraints: On the Institutional Conditions of Diversified Quality Production‟. In: Streeck, W., Social Institutions and Economic Performance. Studies on Industrial Relations in Advanced Capitalist Economies. London: Sage, 1-40.
Streeck, W. and Thelen, K. (eds.) (2005): Change and Discontinuity in Institutional Analysis: Explorations in the Dynamics of Advanced Political Economies. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Swann, G. M. P., Prevezer, M., and Stout, D. (1998) (eds.): The Dynamics of Industrial Clustering: International Comparisons in Computing and Biotechnology. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Thelen, K. (2004): How Institutions Evolve. New York: Cambridge University Press.
Trigilia, C. (2004): „The Governance of High-Tech Districts‟. In: Crouch, C. et al (eds.), q.v., 321-30.
Voelzkow, H. (with S. Elbing and M. Schröder) (2007): Jenseits nationaler Produktionsmodelle? Die Governance regionaler Wirtschaftscluster. Eine international vergleichende Analyse. Marburg: Metropolis (forthcoming).
Voelzkow, H., Crouch, C. and Leuenberger, T. (2006) (eds) „Local Production Systems in Europe‟, unpublished report to Volkswagen Stiftung. Frankfurt am Main: VW Stiftung.
_____ and Schröder, M. (2006): „Governance of the furniture industry in Ostwestfalen-Lippe and its national context: A local economy conforming to the “German model”?‟ In Voelzkow, Crouch, and Leuenberger (eds), q.v., 70-108.
_____ and _____ (2006b): ‚Die Governance der Möbelindustrie in Ostwestfalen-Lippe und ihr nationaler Kontext: Ein „typisch deutsches“ Wirtschaftscluster?‟ In: Kleinfeld, R. (Hrsg.), Muster regionaler Politikgestaltung in Europa. Osnabrück: Verlag Dirk Koentopp, 9-51.
Womack, J., Jones, D., Roos, D. (1991): The Machine That Changed the World: The Story of Lean Production. New York: Harper Perennial.