Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Weather and seasons together demand complex biological clocks

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Troein, Carl, Locke, James C. W., Turner, Matthew S. and Millar, A. J. (Andrew J.). (2009) Weather and seasons together demand complex biological clocks. Current Biology, Vol.19 (No.22). pp. 1961-1964. ISSN 0960-9822

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.024

Abstract

The 24-hour rhythms of the circadian clock [1] allow an organism to anticipate daily environmental cycles, giving it a competitive advantage [2, 3]. Although clock components show little protein sequence homology across phyla, multiple feedback loops and light inputs are universal features of clock networks [4, 5]. Why have circadian systems evolved such a complex structure? All biological clocks entrain a set of regulatory genes to the environmental cycle, in order to correctly time the expression of many downstream processes. Thus the question becomes: What aspects of the environment, and of the desired downstream regulation, are demanding the observed complexity? To answer this, we have evolved gene regulatory networks in silico, selecting for networks that correctly predict particular phases of the day under light/dark cycles. Gradually increasing the realism of the environmental cycles, we have tested the networks for the minimal characteristics of clocks observed in nature: oscillation under constant conditions, entrainment to light signals, and the presence of multiple feedback loops and light inputs. Realistic circadian gene networks are found to require a nontrivial combination of conditions, with seasonal differences in photoperiod as a necessary but not sufficient component.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: Q Science > QC Physics
Q Science > QH Natural history > QH301 Biology
Q Science > QP Physiology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Physics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Circadian rhythms, Circadian rhythms -- Mathematical models, Biological rhythms -- Mathematical models, Gene regulatory networks, Photoperiodism
Journal or Publication Title: Current Biology
Publisher: Cell Press
ISSN: 0960-9822
Date: 1 December 2009
Volume: Vol.19
Number: No.22
Number of Pages: 4
Page Range: pp. 1961-1964
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.cub.2009.09.024
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Funder: France. Agence nationale de la recherche (ANR), Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council (Great Britain) (BBSRC), Human frontier science program (HFSP), Gatsby Charitable Foundation
Grant number: BB/F005466 (BBSRC)
References: 1. Dunlap, J.C., Loros, J.J., and Decoursey, P.J. (2003). Chronobiology: Biological Timekeeping (Sunderland, MA: Sinauer). 2. Ouyang, Y., Andersson, C.R., Kondo, T., Golden, S.S., and Johnson, C.H. (1998). Resonating circadian clocks enhance fitness in cyanobacteria. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 95, 8660–8664. 3. Dodd, A.N., Salathia, N., Hall, A., Kevei, E., Toth, R., Nagy, F., Hibberd, J.M., Millar, A.J., and Webb, A.A. (2005). Plant circadian clocks increase photosynthesis, growth, survival, and competitive advantage. Science 309, 630–633. 4. Stelling, J., Sauer, U., Szallasi, Z., Doyle, F.J., 3rd, and Doyle, J. (2004). Robustness of cellular functions. Cell 118, 675–685. 5. Rand, D.A., Shulgin, B.V., Salazar, D., and Millar, A.J. (2004). Design principles underlying circadian clocks. J. R. Soc. Interface 1, 119–130. 6. Franc¸ ois, P., and Hakim, V. (2004). Design of genetic networks with specified functions by evolution in silico. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 101, 580–585. 7. Wagner, A. (2005). Circuit topology and the evolution of robustness in two-gene circadian oscillators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 11775–11780. 8. Rodrigo, G., Carrera, J., and Jaramillo, A. (2008). Computational design and evolution of the oscillatory response under light–dark cycles. Biochimie 90, 888–897. 9. Merrow, M., Spoelstra, K., and Roenneberg, T. (2005). The circadian cycle: Daily rhythms from behaviour to genes. EMBO Rep. 6, 930–935. 10. Forger, D.B., and Peskin, C.S. (2005). Stochastic simulation of the mammalian circadian clock. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 102, 321–324. 11. Gonze, D., and Goldbeter, A. (2006). Circadian rhythms and molecular noise. Chaos 16, 026110. 12. Gonze, D., Halloy, J., and Goldbeter, A. (2002). Robustness of circadian rhythms with respect to molecular noise. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 673–678. 13. Vilar, J.M.G., Kueh, H.Y., Barkai, N., and Leibler, S. (2002). Mechanisms of noise-resistance in genetic oscillators. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 99, 5988–5992. 14. Chabot, J.R., Pedraza, J.M., Luitel, P., and van Oudenaarden, A. (2007). Stochastic gene expression out-of-steady-state in the cyanobacterial circadian clock. Nature 450, 1249–1252. 15. Moore, K.E., Fitzjarrald, D.R., Sakai, R.K., Goulden, M.L., Munger, J.W., and Wofsy, S.C. (1996). Seasonal variation in radiative and turbulent exchange at a deciduous forest in central Massachusetts. J. Appl. Meteorol. 35, 122–134. 16. Smolen, P., Baxter, D.A., and Byrne, J.H. (2002). A reduced model clarifies the role of feedback loops and time delays in the Drosophila circadian oscillator. Biophys. J. 83, 2349–2359. 17. Smolen, P., Hardin, P.E., Lo, B.S., Baxter, D.A., and Byrne, J.H. (2004). Simulation of Drosophila circadian oscillations, mutations, and light responses by a model with VRI, PDP-1, and CLK. Biophys. J. 86, 2786–2802. 18. Akman, O.E., Locke, J.C.W., Tang, S., Carre´ , I., Millar, A.J., and Rand, D.A. (2008). Isoform switching facilitates period control in the Neurospora crassa circadian clock. Mol. Syst. Biol. 4, 164. 19. Lema, M.A., Golombek, D.A., and Echave, J. (2000). Delay model of the circadian pacemaker. J. Theor. Biol. 204, 565–573. 20. Ackers, G.K., Johnson, A.D., and Shea, M.A. (1982). Quantitative model for gene regulation by lambda phage repressor. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 79, 1129–1133. 21. Galassi, M., Davies, J., Theiler, J., Gough, B., Jungman, G., Alken, P., Booth, M., and Rossi, F. (2009). GNU Scientific Library Reference Manual, Third Edition (Bristol: Network Theory). 22. Herrera, F., Lozano, M., and Verdegay, J.L. (1998). Tackling real-coded genetic algorithms: Operators and tools for behavioural analysis. Artif. Intell. Rev. 12, 265–319. 23. Plautz, J.D., Straume, M., Stanewsky, R., Jamison, C.F., Brandes, C., Dowse, H.B., Hall, J.C., and Kay, S.A. (1997). Quantitative analysis of Drosophila period gene transcription in living animals. J. Biol. Rhythms 12, 204–217.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/16815

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us