Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

How does probability theory generalize logic?

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Miller, David (2004) How does probability theory generalize logic? In: Sextas Jornadas Rolando Chuaqui, Santiago, Chile, May 2004 pp. 1-23. (Unpublished)

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-How-does-probability-theory-generalize-logic-Miller-2004.pdf - Other - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (262Kb) | Preview

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Nearly half a century ago Popper [1959], appendices *iv and *v, presented a number of related axiomatizations of the theory of probability in each of which p(x | z) is defined for all x and z, even z = yy' (where concatenation turns out to represent meet, and the accent complementation). These systems are too little known amongst mathematicians. Popper went on to claim that his systems provide a context within which it is possible to give fully correct definitions of the relation of derivability between sentences (in the sense of the classical sentential calculus), and of the property of sentential demonstrability, by means of the formulas
z |- x =Df p(x | zx') = 1
|- x =Df p(x | x') = 1.
This claim has been challenged by Stalnaker [1970], Harper [1975], and by Leblanc & van Fraassen [1979]. The challenge has never been properly answered (though a start was made in Popper & Miller [1994], §4). The aim of this talk is to answer it, and to contrast Popper’s enterprise with what is known as probabilistic semantics.

Item Type: Conference Item (Other)
Subjects: B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > B Philosophy (General)
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BC Logic
Q Science > QA Mathematics
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Philosophy
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Probabilities, Logic, Popper, Karl R. (Karl Raimund), 1902-1994, Algebra
Official Date: May 2004
Dates:
DateEvent
May 2004Completion
Page Range: pp. 1-23
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Unpublished
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): This paper belongs to the author. Please note that unpublished papers are subject to correction, revision, and modernization, without explicit notice. No version, current or obsolete, of any of these papers and lectures should be cited in print without the author's written permission.
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Copyright Holders: D. W. Miller
Conference Paper Type: Other
Title of Event: Sextas Jornadas Rolando Chuaqui
Type of Event: Other
Location of Event: Santiago, Chile
Date(s) of Event: May 2004
Related URLs:
  • Other

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us