Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Optimising a person-centred approach to stopping medicines in older people with multimorbidity and polypharmacy using the DExTruS framework : a realist review

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Turk, Amadea, Wong, Geoffrey, Mahtani, Kamal R., Madden, Michelle, Hill, Ruaraidh, Ranson, Ed, Wallace, Emma K., Krskaa, Janet, Mangin, Dee, Byng, Richard, Lasserson, Daniel and Reeve, Joanne L. (2022) Optimising a person-centred approach to stopping medicines in older people with multimorbidity and polypharmacy using the DExTruS framework : a realist review. BMC Medicine, 20 (1). 297. doi:10.1186/s12916-022-02475-1 ISSN 1741-7015.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-optimising-person-centred-approach-stopping-medicines-older-people-with-multimorbidity-polypharmacy-using-the-DExTruS-framework-Lasserson-2022.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution 4.0.

Download (1618Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1186/s12916-022-02475-1

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Background: Tackling problematic polypharmacy requires tailoring the use of medicines to individual circumstances and may involve the process of deprescribing. Deprescribing can cause anxiety and concern for clinicians and patients. Tailoring medication decisions often entails beyond protocol decision-making, a complex process involving emotional and cognitive work for healthcare professionals and patients. We undertook realist review to highlight and understand the interactions between different factors involved in deprescribing and to develop a final programme theory that identifies and explains components of good practice that support a person-centred approach to deprescribing in older patients with multimorbidity and polypharmacy. Methods: The realist approach involves identifying underlying causal mechanisms and exploring how, and under what conditions they work. We conducted a search of electronic databases which were supplemented by citation checking and consultation with stakeholders to identify other key documents. The review followed the key steps outlined by Pawson et al. and followed the RAMESES standards for realist syntheses. Results: We included 119 included documents from which data were extracted to produce context-mechanism-outcome configurations (CMOCs) and a final programme theory. Our programme theory recognises that deprescribing is a complex intervention influenced by a multitude of factors. The components of our final programme theory include the following: a supportive infrastructure that provides clear guidance around professional responsibilities and that enables multidisciplinary working and continuity of care, consistent access to high-quality relevant patient contextual data, the need to support the creation of a shared explanation and understanding of the meaning and purpose of medicines and a trial and learn approach that provides space for monitoring and continuity. These components may support the development of trust which may be key to managing the uncertainty and in turn optimise outcomes. These components are summarised in the novel DExTruS framework. Conclusion: Our findings recognise the complex interpretive practice and decision-making involved in medication management and identify key components needed to support best practice. Our findings have implications for how we design medication review consultations, professional training and for patient records/data management. Our review also highlights the role that trust plays both as a central element of tailored prescribing and a potential outcome of good practice in this area.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RA Public aspects of medicine
R Medicine > RM Therapeutics. Pharmacology
R Medicine > RS Pharmacy and materia medica
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
SWORD Depositor: Library Publications Router
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Polypharmacy , Older people -- Medical care
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Medicine
Publisher: BioMed Central Ltd.
ISSN: 1741-7015
Official Date: 31 August 2022
Dates:
DateEvent
31 August 2022Published
12 July 2022Accepted
Volume: 20
Number: 1
Article Number: 297
DOI: 10.1186/s12916-022-02475-1
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access (Creative Commons)
Date of first compliant deposit: 31 August 2022
Date of first compliant Open Access: 1 September 2022
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
NIHR HTA 17/69/02National Institute for Health and Care Excellencehttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100010377
NIHR HTA 17/69/02Health Technology Assessment programmehttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000664

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us