Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Sterile versus non-sterile gloves for traumatic wounds in the ED

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Metcalfe, David, Parsons, Nick R. and Costa, Matthew L. (2022) Sterile versus non-sterile gloves for traumatic wounds in the ED. Emergency Medicine Journal, 39 (9). pp. 648-649. doi:10.1136/emermed-2022-212517

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-sterile-versus-non-sterile-gloves-traumatic-wounds-ED-2022.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (363Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212517

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

In their Emergency Medicine Journal paper, Zwaans et al present a randomised controlled trial that asked whether the use of non-sterile gloves and dressings affects risk of infection when suturing traumatic wounds in the ED.1

Most randomised trials compare two treatments so they can determine which is better. However, such a ‘superiority’ design would not make sense when comparing the effect of sterile and non-sterile gloves as there is no reason to think that non-sterile gloves should be superior in terms of reducing wound infections. There may nevertheless be other reasons to prefer non-sterile gloves if they are ‘not much worse’—perhaps because they are cheaper, more accessible or generate less packaging waste. Zwaans et al therefore chose a non-inferiority trial design. Instead of asking whether sterile or non-sterile gloves are ‘better’, their trial asked whether non-sterile gloves are ‘much worse’ than sterile equivalents.

Item Type: Journal Item
Subjects: R Medicine > RD Surgery
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Surgical gloves, Surgical wound infections -- Prevention, Wounds and injuries -- Treatment
Journal or Publication Title: Emergency Medicine Journal
Publisher: BMJ Group
ISSN: 1472-0205
Official Date: 23 August 2022
Dates:
DateEvent
23 August 2022Published
26 July 2022Available
11 July 2022Accepted
11 April 2022Submitted
Volume: 39
Number: 9
Page Range: pp. 648-649
DOI: 10.1136/emermed-2022-212517
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): This article has been accepted for publication in Emergency Medicine Journal, 2022 following peer review, and the Version of Record can be accessed online at http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/emermed-2022-212517 © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2022. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us