Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

A response to Ellis : the dangers of a narrowly focused SLA canon

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Anderson, Jason (2020) A response to Ellis : the dangers of a narrowly focused SLA canon. ELT Journal, 74 (2). pp. 195-197. doi:10.1093/elt/ccaa016

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-response-Ellis-dangers-narrowly-focused-SLA-canon-Anderson-2020.pdf - Accepted Version - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (578Kb) | Preview
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa016

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

I thank Rod Ellis (2020) for taking time to read and respond to my critique of his original work (2019). However, while he grasps some of the aspects of the TATE framework that I propose as an alternative (Anderson 2020), there is evidence in his response that he misconstrues it, and assigns my nuanced discussion of explicit and implicit processes within what I called a ‘TSLT-mainly framework’ (p. 183) to the category of ‘structural approach’, which he then argues is not as effective as his proposal, drawing on familiar arguments used against structural approaches. First I consider his responses to my two criticisms of his model, and then I sound a word of caution regarding the dangers of a narrowly-focused SLA canon that frequently interprets ‘learning’ as acquisition of morphosyntax, and ‘use’ as spoken production to the detriment of other aspects of language.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: L Education > L Education (General)
L Education > LB Theory and practice of education
P Language and Literature > PE English
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Centre for Applied Linguistics
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Ellis, R. -- Criticism and interpretation, Second language acquisition , Language and languages -- Study and teaching, Curriculum change
Journal or Publication Title: ELT Journal
Publisher: Oxford University Press
ISSN: 0951-0893
Official Date: 2 April 2020
Dates:
DateEvent
2 April 2020Published
17 March 2020Available
15 January 2020Accepted
Volume: 74
Number: 2
Page Range: pp. 195-197
DOI: 10.1093/elt/ccaa016
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Reuse Statement (publisher, data, author rights): This is a pre-copyedited, author-produced version of an article accepted for publication in ELT Journal following peer review. The version of record Jason Anderson, A Response to Ellis: The Dangers of a Narrowly Focused SLA Canon, ELT Journal, Volume 74, Issue 2, April 2020, Pages 195–197, is available online at: https://doi.org/10.1093/elt/ccaa016
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us