Petrou, Stavros, Abangma, Giselle, Johnson, Samantha J., Wolke, Dieter and Marlow, Neil (2009) Costs and health utilities associated with extremely preterm birth : evidence from the EPICure study. Value in Health, Vol.12 (No.8). pp. 1124-1134. doi:10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00580.x

Research output not available from this repository, contact author.

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Objective:
To estimate costs and health utilities associated with extremely preterm birth at approximately 11 years of age using evidence from a whole population study (the EPICure study).
Methods:
The study population comprised surviving children born at 20 through 25 completed weeks of gestation in all 276 maternity units in the United Kingdom and Republic of Ireland from March through December 1995 and a control group of classmates born at full term, matched for age, sex, and ethnic group. Estimates of utilization of health, social, and education services were combined with unit costs derived from primary and secondary sources. Generalized liner regression was used to estimate the impact of extremely preterm birth on public sector costs during the 11th year of life. Suboptimal levels of function for each of the eight attributes of the Health Utilities Index Mark III (cognition, vision, hearing, speech, ambulation, dexterity, emotion, and pain) and multiplicative multi-attribute utility scores were compared between the extremely preterm children and their classmates. Tobit regressions were performed to explore the effects of gestational age at birth on the Health Utilities Index Mark III multiattribute utility score.
Results:
Mean (standard deviation [SD]) public sector costs over the 12-month period were 6484 pound (5548) pound for the combined extremely preterm group and 4007 pound (2537) pound for their classmates, generating a mean cost difference of 2477 pound (bootstrap 95% confidence interval [CI] 1605 pound, 3360) pound that was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The generalized linear models revealed that compared to birth at term, birth at < 23 completed weeks, 24+0-24+6 weeks and 25+0-25+6 weeks gestation increased public sector costs by an average of 2417 pound (95% CI 60 pound, 4774; pound P = 0.044), 1528 pound (95% CI 129 pound, 2927; pound P = 0.032) and 1501 pound (95% CI 428 pound, 2574; pound P = 0.006), respectively. In all eight attributes of the Health Utilities Index Mark III, there were significantly higher proportions of suboptimal levels of function among the extremely preterm children (P < 0.05). The mean (SD) multiattribute utility score for the extremely preterm children as a cohort was 0.789 (0.264), compared to 0.956 (0.102) for the classmates born at term, a mean difference in utility score of 0.167 (95% CI 0.124, 0.209) that was statistically significant (P < 0.001). The Tobit regressions revealed that, compared to birth at term, birth at < 23 completed weeks, 24+0-24+6 weeks and 25+0-25+6 weeks gestation reduced the Health Utilities Index Mark III multi-attribute utility score by an average of 0.312 (95% CI 0.169, 0.455; P < 0.001), 0.337 (95% CI 0.235, 0.439; P < 0.001) and 0.243 (95% CI 0.159, 0.327; P < 0.001), respectively.
Conclusions:
The results of this study should be used to inform the development of future economic evaluations of interventions aimed at preventing extremely preterm birth or alleviating its effects.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	R Medicine > R Medicine (General) R Medicine > RG Gynecology and obstetrics R Medicine > RJ Pediatrics
Divisions:	Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):	Premature infants , Premature infants -- Economic aspects -- Great Britain, Child health services -- Costs, Medical care, Cost of, Medical economics, Quality of life
Journal or Publication Title:	Value in Health
Publisher:	Wiley-Blackwell Publishing, Inc.
ISSN:	1098-3015
Official Date:	November 2009
Dates:	Date Event November 2009 Published
Volume:	Vol.12
Number:	No.8
Number of Pages:	11
Page Range:	pp. 1124-1134
DOI:	10.1111/j.1524-4733.2009.00580.x
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
Funder:	Medical Research Council (Great Britain) (MRC), James Tudor Foundation

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item