Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

A systematic review of outcome reporting in clinical trials of distal tibia and ankle fractures : the need for a core outcome set

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Pearson, Nathan A., Tutton, Elizabeth, Joeris, Alex, Gwilym, Steve, Grant, Richard, Keene, David J. and Haywood, Kirstie L. (2022) A systematic review of outcome reporting in clinical trials of distal tibia and ankle fractures : the need for a core outcome set. Bone & Joint Open, 3 (10). pp. 832-840. doi:10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0080.R1

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP-A-systematic-review-of-outcome-reporting-in-clinical-trials-of-distal-tibia-and-ankle-fractures-the-need-for-a-core-outcome-set-Haywood-2022.pdf - Published Version - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (425Kb) | Preview
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-008...

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Aim: To describe outcome reporting variation and trends in non-pharmacological randomised clinical trials (RCT) of distal tibia and/or ankle fractures.
Method: Five electronic databases and three clinical trial registries were searched (January 2000-February 2022). Trials including patients with distal tibia and/or ankle fractures without concomitant injuries were included. One reviewer conducted all searches, screened titles, and abstracts, assessed eligibility, and completed data extraction; a random 10% subset were independently assessed and extracted by a second reviewer at each stage. All extracted outcomes were mapped to a modified version of the International Classification of Functioning, Disability and Health framework. The quality of outcome reporting (reproducibility) was assessed.
Results: 105 trials (n=16 to 669 participants) from 27 countries were included. Trials compared surgical interventions (62), post-surgical management options (17), rehabilitative interventions (14), surgical versus non-surgical interventions (6), and pre-surgical management strategies (5).
In total, 888 outcome assessments were reported across seven domains: 263 assessed body structure or function (85.7% of trials), 136 activities (68.6% of trials), 34 participation (23.8% of trials), 159 health-related quality of life (61.9% of trials), 247 processes of care (80% of trials), 21 patient experiences (15.2% of trials), and 28 economic impact (8.6% of trials). From these, 337 discrete outcomes were described. Outcome reporting was inconsistent across trials. The quality of reporting varied widely (reproducibility ranged 4.8% patient experience to 100% complications).
Conclusion: Substantial heterogeneity in outcome selection, assessment methods and reporting quality were described. Despite the large number of outcomes, few are reported across multiple trials. Most outcomes are clinically focused, with little attention to the long-term consequences important to patients. Poor reporting quality reduces confidence in data quality, inhibiting data synthesis by which to inform care decisions. Outcome reporting guidance and standardisation, that captures the outcomes that matter to multiple stakeholders, is urgently required.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > R Medicine (General)
R Medicine > RD Surgery
R Medicine > RZ Other systems of medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Health Sciences > Warwick Research in Nursing
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Tibia -- Fractures -- Treatment, Ankle -- Fractures, Systematic reviews (Medical research), Outcome assessment (Medical care), Clinical trials
Journal or Publication Title: Bone & Joint Open
Publisher: British Editorial Society of Bone and Joint Surgery
ISSN: 2633-1462
Official Date: 24 October 2022
Dates:
DateEvent
24 October 2022Published
17 August 2022Accepted
Volume: 3
Number: 10
Page Range: pp. 832-840
DOI: 10.1302/2633-1462.310.BJO-2022-0080.R1
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
UNSPECIFIEDAO Foundationhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100001702

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Downloads

Downloads per month over past year

View more statistics

twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us