Photography and causation: responding to scruton's scepticism
Phillips, Dawn M.. (2009) Photography and causation: responding to scruton's scepticism. British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol.49 (No.4 Sp. Iss. SI). pp. 327-340. ISSN 0007-0904Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/aesthj/ayp036
According to Roger Scruton, it is not possible for photographs to be representational art. Most responses to Scruton's scepticism are versions of the claim that Scruton disregards the extent to which intentionality features in photography; but these cannot force him to give up his notion of the ideal photograph. My approach is to argue that Scruton has misconstrued the role Of causation in his discussion of photography. I claim that although Scruton insists that the ideal photograph is defined by its 'merely causal' provenance, in fact details to take the causal provenance of photographs seriously enough. To replace Scruton's notion of the ideal photograph, I offer a substantive account of the causal provenance of photographs, centred on the distinctive role of 'the photographic event'. I conclude that, with a proper understanding of the photographic process, we have good reason to re-open the question of photography as a representational art.
|Item Type:||Journal Article|
|Subjects:||N Fine Arts
A General Works > AZ History of Scholarship The Humanities
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology|
|Journal or Publication Title:||British Journal of Aesthetics|
|Publisher:||Oxford University Press|
|Official Date:||October 2009|
|Number:||No.4 Sp. Iss. SI|
|Number of Pages:||14|
|Page Range:||pp. 327-340|
|Access rights to Published version:||Restricted or Subscription Access|
Actions (login required)