Phillips, Dawn M.. (2009) Photography and causation: responding to scruton's scepticism. British Journal of Aesthetics, Vol.49 (No.4 Sp. Iss. SI). pp. 327-340. ISSN 0007-0904

Full text not available from this repository.

Abstract

According to Roger Scruton, it is not possible for photographs to be representational art. Most responses to Scruton's scepticism are versions of the claim that Scruton disregards the extent to which intentionality features in photography; but these cannot force him to give up his notion of the ideal photograph. My approach is to argue that Scruton has misconstrued the role Of causation in his discussion of photography. I claim that although Scruton insists that the ideal photograph is defined by its 'merely causal' provenance, in fact details to take the causal provenance of photographs seriously enough. To replace Scruton's notion of the ideal photograph, I offer a substantive account of the causal provenance of photographs, centred on the distinctive role of 'the photographic event'. I conclude that, with a proper understanding of the photographic process, we have good reason to re-open the question of photography as a representational art.

Item Type:	Journal Article
Subjects:	N Fine Arts A General Works > AZ History of Scholarship The Humanities
Divisions:	Faculty of Social Sciences > Sociology
Journal or Publication Title:	British Journal of Aesthetics
Publisher:	Oxford University Press
ISSN:	0007-0904
Date:	October 2009
Volume:	Vol.49
Number:	No.4 Sp. Iss. SI
Number of Pages:	14
Page Range:	pp. 327-340
Identification Number:	10.1093/aesthj/ayp036
Status:	Peer Reviewed
Publication Status:	Published
Access rights to Published version:	Restricted or Subscription Access
URI:	http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/17098

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item