Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

The value of volunteer surveillance for the early detection of biological invaders

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

van den Bosch, Frank, McRoberts, Neil, Bourhis, Yoann, Parnell, Stephen and Hassall, Kirsty L. (2023) The value of volunteer surveillance for the early detection of biological invaders. Journal of Theoretical Biology, 560 . 111385. doi:10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111385 ISSN 0022-5193.

[img] PDF
WRAP-value-volunteer-surveillance-early-detection-biological-invaders-23.pdf - Accepted Version
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only until 21 December 2023. Contact author directly, specifying your specific needs. - Requires a PDF viewer.
Available under License Creative Commons Attribution Non-commercial No Derivatives 4.0.

Download (1544Kb)
Official URL: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111385

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

Early detection of invaders requires finding small numbers of individuals across large landscapes. It has been argued that the only feasible way to achieve the sampling effort needed for early detection of an invader is to involve volunteer groups (citizen scientists, passive surveyors, etc.). A key concern is that volunteers may have a considerable false-positive and false-negative rate. The question then becomes whether verification of a report from a volunteer is worth the effort. This question is the topic of this paper. Since we are interested in early detection we calculate the Z% upper limit of the one sided confidence interval of the incidence (fraction infected) and use the term maximum expected plausible incidence for this. We compare the maximum plausible incidence when the expert samples on their own, q ∼, and the maximum plausible incidence when the expert only verifies cases reported by the volunteer surveyor to be infected, q ∼. The maximum plausible incidences q ∼ and q ∼. are related as, q ∼=θ 1-θ q ∼ where θ and θ are the false positive and false negative rate of the volunteer surveyor, respectively. We also show that the optimal monitoring programme consists of verifying only the cases reported by the volunteer surveyor if, T T <θ 1-θ , where T is the time needed for a sample taken by the expert and T is the time needed for an expert to verify a case reported by a volunteer surveyor. Our results can be used to calculate the maximum plausible incidence of a plant disease based on reports of passive surveyors that have been verified by experts and data from experts sampling on their own. The results can also be used in the development phase of a surveillance project to assess whether including passive surveyor reports is useful in the early detection of exotic invaders.

Item Type: Journal Article
Divisions: Faculty of Science, Engineering and Medicine > Science > Life Sciences (2010- )
SWORD Depositor: Library Publications Router
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Theoretical Biology
Publisher: Elsevier
ISSN: 0022-5193
Official Date: 7 March 2023
Dates:
DateEvent
7 March 2023Published
21 December 2022Available
11 December 2022Accepted
Volume: 560
Number of Pages: 11
Article Number: 111385
DOI: 10.1016/j.jtbi.2022.111385
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Copyright Holders: Elsevier
Date of first compliant deposit: 17 February 2023
RIOXX Funder/Project Grant:
Project/Grant IDRIOXX Funder NameFunder ID
20-0850-000-SACalifornia Department of Food and Agriculturehttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100006759
BBS/OS/CP/000001[BBSRC] Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Councilhttp://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000268
TH42222FR09UK government Department for Environment, Food and Rural AffairsUNSPECIFIED
Open Access Version:
  • bioRxiv

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us