Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Decentralization and electoral accountability: Incentives, separation and voter welfare

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Hindriks, Jean and Lockwood, Ben (2009) Decentralization and electoral accountability: Incentives, separation and voter welfare. In: 4th CESifo-Delphi Conference on Government, Institutions and Macroeconomic Performance, Munich, Germany, May 30-31, 2008. Published in: European Journal of Political Economy, Vol.25 (No.3 Sp. Iss. SI). pp. 385-397.

Full text not available from this repository.
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.01.004

Abstract

This paper provides a systematic analysis of fiscal decentralization on the quality of government by studying jointly its effects on electoral discipline and selection, in a setting where, realistically, voters only have limited information about fiscal policy in other jurisdictions, ruling out yardstick competition. Fiscal centralization reduces the extent of electoral discipline. as a corrupt (rent-seeking) incumbent can target good behavior only at a "minimum winning coalition" of regions (selective rent-diversion) in order to retain office, but thus makes it more profitable for bad incumbents to pool with good ones, thus increasing the probability of electoral discipline occurring at all. Voters tend to prefer centralization when politicians are low quality i.e. more likely to be corruptible. Centralization with uniform taxes can dominate both unconstrained centralization and decentralization, explaining why uniform taxes are so widely observed. (C) 2009 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Item Type: Conference Item (Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HC Economic History and Conditions
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Economics
Journal or Publication Title: European Journal of Political Economy
Publisher: Elsevier BV
ISSN: 0176-2680
Date: September 2009
Volume: Vol.25
Number: No.3 Sp. Iss. SI
Number of Pages: 13
Page Range: pp. 385-397
Identification Number: 10.1016/j.ejpoleco.2009.01.004
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Restricted or Subscription Access
Conference Paper Type: Paper
Title of Event: 4th CESifo-Delphi Conference on Government, Institutions and Macroeconomic Performance
Type of Event: Conference
Location of Event: Munich, Germany
Date(s) of Event: May 30-31, 2008
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/17393

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us