Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Equilibrium return and agents' survival in a multiperiod asset market: analytic support of a simulation model

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Anufriev, Mikhail and Dindo, Pietro (2007) Equilibrium return and agents' survival in a multiperiod asset market: analytic support of a simulation model. Working Paper. Warwick Business School, Financial Econometrics Research Centre, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Anufriev_fwp07-03.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (1277Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/research/wfr...

Abstract

We study the co-evolution of asset prices and agents’ wealth in a financial market populated by an arbitrary number of heterogeneous, boundedly rational investors. We model assets’ demand to be proportional to agents’ wealth, so that wealth dynamics can be used as a selection device. For a general class of investment behaviors, we are able to characterize the long run market outcome, i.e. the steady-state equilibrium values of asset return, and agents’ survival. Our investigation illustrates that market forces pose certain limits on the outcome of agents’ interactions even within the “wilderness of bounded rationality”. As an application we show that our analysis provides a rigorous explanation for the results of the simulation model introduced in Levy, Levy, and Solomon (1994).

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Financial Econometrics Research Centre
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Assets (Accounting), Price -- Mathematical models, Rational expectations (Economic theory), Evolutionary economics
Series Name: Working papers (Warwick Business School. Financial Econometrics Research Centre)
Publisher: Warwick Business School, Financial Econometrics Research Centre
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: 11 December 2007
Number: No.07-
Number of Pages: 43
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Sixth Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP6)
Grant number: FP6-2003-NEST-PATH-1 (SFP), FP6-012410 (SFP)
References: Anufriev, M. (2008): “Wealth-Driven Competition in a Speculative Financial Market: Examples with Maximizing Agents,” Quantitative Finance, forthcoming. Anufriev, M., and G. Bottazzi (2006): “Price andWealth Dynamics in a Speculative Market with Generic Procedurally Rational Traders,” CeNDEF Working Paper 2006-02, University of Amsterdam. Anufriev, M., G. Bottazzi, and F. Pancotto (2006): “Equilibria, Stability and Asymptotic Dominance in a Speculative Market with Heterogeneous Agents,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30, 1787–1835. Arrow, K. (1965): Aspects of the Theory of Risk-Bearing. Helsinki: Yrjo Hahnsson Foundation. Blume, L., and D. Easley (1992): “Evolution and Market Behavior,” The Journal of Economic Theory, 58, 9–40. (2006): “If you are So Smart, Why aren’t you Rich? Belief Selection in Complete and Incomplete Markets,” Econometrica, 74, 929–966. Brock, W., and C. Hommes (1997): “A Rational Route to Randomness,” Econometrica, 65, 1059–1095. (1998): “Heterogeneous Beliefs and Routes to Chaos in a Simple Asset Pricing Model,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 22, 1235–1274. Brock, W., C. Hommes, and F. Wagener (2005): “Evolutionary Dynamics in Markets with Many Trader Types,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 41, 7–42. (2006): “More Hedging Instruments May Destabilize Markets,” CeNDEF Working Paper 06-12, University of Amsterdam. Chiarella, C., R. Dieci, and L. Gardini (2006): “Asset Price and Wealth Dynamics in a Financial Market with Heterogeneous Agents,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 30, 1755–1786. (2007): “Heterogeneous Expectations and Speculative Behavior in a Dynamic Multi-asset Framework,” Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 62, 408–427. Chiarella, C., and X. He (2001): “Asset Price and Wealth Dynamics under Heterogeneous Expectations,” Quantitative Finance, 1, 509–526. (2002): “An Adaptive Model on Asset Pricing and Wealth Dynamics with Heterogeneous Trading Strategies,” Research Paper Series 84, Quantitative Finance Research Centre, University of Technology, Sydney. Evstigneev, I., T. Hens, and K. Schenk-Hoppé (2006): “Evolutionary Stable Stock Markets,” Economic Theory, 27, 449–468. Gaunersdorfer, A. (2000): “Endogenous Fluctuations in a Simple Asset Pricing Model with Heterogeneous Agents,” Journal of Economic Dynamics and Control, 24, 799–831. Grandmont, J.-M. (1998): “Expectations Formation and Stability of Large Socioeconomic Systems,” Econometrica, 66(4), 741–781. Hens, T., and K. Schenk-Hopp´e (2005): “Evolutionary Stability of Portfolio Rules in Incomplete Markets,” Journal of Mathematical Economics, 41, 43–66. Hommes, C. (2006): “Heterogeneous Agent Models in Economics and Finance,” in Handbook of Computational Economics Vol. 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics, ed. by K. Judd, and L. Tesfatsion. North-Holland (Handbooks in Economics Series), Amsterdam, forthcoming. Kahneman, D., and A. Tversky (1979): “Prospect Theory: An Analysis of Decision under Risk,” Econometrica, 47(2), 263–292. Kroll, Y., H. Levy, and A. Rapoport (1988): “Experimental Tests of the Mean-Variance Model for Portfolio Selection,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 42, 388–410. Kuznetsov, Y. (2004): Elements of Applied Bifurcation Theory. Springer, New York, 3 edn. LeBaron, B. (2006): “Agent-Based Computational Finance,” in Handbook of Computational Economics Vol. 2: Agent-Based Computational Economics, ed. by K. Judd, and L. Tesfatsion. North-Holland (Handbooks in Economics Series), forthcoming. Levy, M., and H. Levy (1996): “The Danger of Assuming Homogeneous Expectations,” Financial Analysts Journal, 52(3), 65–70. Levy, M., H. Levy, and S. Solomon (1994): “A Microscopic Model of the Stock Market: Cycles, Booms, and Crashes,” Economics Letters, 45, 103–111. (2000): Microscopic Simulation of Financial Markets. Academic Press, London. Medio, A., and M. Lines (2001): Nonlinear Dynamics. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. Pratt, J. W. (1964): “Risk-aversion in the Small and in the Large,” Econometrica, 32(1/2), 122–136. Sandroni, A. (2000): “Do Markets Favor Agents Able to Make Accurate Predictions,” Econometrica, 68(6), 1303–1341. Zschischang, E., and T. Lux (2001): “Some New Results on the Levy, Levy and Solomon Microscopic Stock Market Model,” Physica A, 291, 563–573.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1740

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us