Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Cues and knowledge structures used by mental-health professionals when making risk assessments

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Buckingham, C. D., Adams, Ann and Mace, Chris. (2008) Cues and knowledge structures used by mental-health professionals when making risk assessments. Journal of Mental Health, Vol.17 (No.3). pp. 299-314. ISSN 0963-8237

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Adams_jmh_risk_resub.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (165Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09638230701498374

Abstract

Background: Research into mental-health risks has tended to focus on epidemiological approaches and to consider pieces of evidence in isolation. Less is known about the particular factors and their patterns of occurrence that influence clinicians’ risk judgements in practice. Aims: To identify the cues used by clinicians to make risk judgements and to explore how these combine within clinicians’ psychological representations of suicide, self-harm, self-neglect, and harm to others. Method: Content analysis was applied to semi-structured interviews conducted with 46 practitioners from various mental-health disciplines, using mind maps to represent the hierarchical relationships of data and concepts. Results: Strong consensus between experts meant their knowledge could be integrated into a single hierarchical structure for each risk. This revealed contrasting emphases between data and concepts underpinning risks, including: reflection and forethought for suicide; motivation for self-harm; situation and context for harm to others; and current presentation for self-neglect. Conclusions: Analysis of experts’ risk-assessment knowledge identified influential cues and their relationships to risks. It can inform development of valid risk-screening decision support systems that combine actuarial evidence with clinical expertise.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: R Medicine > RC Internal medicine > RC0321 Neuroscience. Biological psychiatry. Neuropsychiatry
B Philosophy. Psychology. Religion > BF Psychology
Divisions: Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School > Mental Health and Wellbeing
Faculty of Science > Psychology
Faculty of Medicine > Warwick Medical School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Mental health -- Research, Risk assessment, Self-mutilation
Journal or Publication Title: Journal of Mental Health
Publisher: Taylor & Francis
ISSN: 0963-8237
Date: 2008
Volume: Vol.17
Number: No.3
Page Range: pp. 299-314
Identification Number: 10.1080/09638230701498374
Status: Peer Reviewed
Publication Status: Published
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Description: Version accepted by publisher (post-print, after peer review, before copy-editing).
Funder: Great Britain. National Health Service (NHS), Great Britain. Dept. of Health (DoH)
References: Bouch, J., & Marshall, J. J. (2005). Suicide risk: structured professional judgement. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 11, 84-91. Buckingham, C. D. (2002). Psychological cue use and implications for a clinical decision support system. Medical Informatics and the Internet in Medicine, 27(4), 237-251. Buckingham, C. D., & Chan, T. (2002). Developing a mental-health risk-screening tool (Tech. Rep.). Surrey Hampshire Borders NHS Trust. Buzan, T. (2003). The mind map boook. BBC Consumer Publishing: London. Carter, G., Reith, D. M., Whyte, I. M., & McPherson, M. (2005). Repeated self-poisoning: increasing severity of self-harm as a predictor of subsequent suicide. British Journal of Psychiatry, 186, 253-257. Castle, K., Duberstein, P. R., Meldrum, S., Conner, K. R., & Conwell, Y. (2004). Risk factors for suicide in blacks and whites: An analysis of data from the 1993 national mortality followback survey. American Journal of Psychiatry, 161, 452-458. Dick, P., Durham, T., Stewart, M., Kane, S., & Duffy, J. (2003). Care programme approach - documentation of past risk-related behaviour. Psychiatric Bulletin, 27, 298-300. Doctor, R. (2004). Psychodynamic lessons in risk assessment and management. Advances in Psychiatric Treatment, 10, 267-276. Freemind. (2006). www.sourceforge.net/freemind. (url accessed in June, 2006) Godin, P. M. (2004). ’you don’t tick boxes on a form’: A study of how community mental health nurses assess and manage risk. Health, Risk & Society, 6(4), 347-360. Hanson, R. K. (2005). Twenty years of progress in violence risk assessment. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 20(2), 212-217. Harris, E. C., & Barraclough, B. (1998). Excess mortality of mental disorder. British Journal of Psychiatry, 173, 11-53. Higgins, N., Watts, D., Bindman, J., Slade, M., & Thornicroft, G. (2005). Assessing violence risk in general psychiatry. Psychiatric Bulletin, 29, 131-133. Holdsworth, N., & Dodgson, G. (2003). Could a new Mental Health Act distort clinical judgement? a Bayesian justification of naturalistic reasoning about risk. Journal of Mental Health, 12(5), 451-462. Maden, A. (2003). Standardised risk assessment: why all the fuss? Psychiatric Bulletin, 25, 129-131. Mays, N., & Pope, C. (2000). Qualitative research in health care: Assessing quality in qualitative research. British Medical Journal, 320, 50-52. Monahan, J., Steadman, H. J., Appelbaum, P. A., Robbins, P. C., Mulvey, E. P., Silver, E. R., et al. (2000). Developing a clinically useful actuarial tool for assessing violence risk. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 176, 312-319. Morgan, H. G., & Priest, P. (1984). Assessment of suicide risk in psychiatric in-patients. British Journal of Psychiatry, 145, 467-469. Morgan, H. G., & Stanton, R. (1997). Suicide among psychiatric in-patients in a changing clinical scene. Suicidal ideation as a paramount index of short-term risk. British Journal of Psychiatry, 171, 561-563. Muehlenkamp, J. J. (2005). Self-injurious behavior as a separate clinical syndrome. American Journal of Orthopsychiatry, 75, 324-333. Neuendorf, K. (2002). The content analysis guidebook. London: Sage. Owens, D., Wood, C., Greenwood, D. C., Hughes, T., & Dennis, M. (2005). Mortality and suicide after non-fatal self-poisoning: 16-year outcome study. British Journal of Psychiatry, 187, 470-475. Ryan, T. (2002). Exploring the risk management strategies of informal carers of mental health service users. Journal of Mental Health, 11(1), 17-25. Skegg, K. (2005). Self-harm. Lancet, 366, 1471-1483. Stengel, E. (1964). Suicide and attempted suicide. Harmondsworth: Penguin. Szmukler, G. (2001). Violence risk prediction in practice. British Journal of Psychiatry, 178, 84-85. Watts, D., Bindman, J., Slade, M., Holloway, F., Rosen, A., & Thornicroft, G. (2004). Clinical assessment of risk decision support (CARDS): The development and evaluation of a feasible violence risk assessment for routine psychiatric practice. Journal of Mental Health, 13(6), 569-581.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/177

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us