CAY revisited: can optimal scaling resurrect the (C)CAPM?
Basu, Devraj and Stremme, Alexander (2005) CAY revisited: can optimal scaling resurrect the (C)CAPM? Working Paper. Coventry: Warwick Business School, Financial Econometrics Research Centre. (Working papers (Warwick Business School. Financial Econometrics Research Centre)).
WRAP_basu_fwp05-04.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/research/wfr...
In this paper, we evaluate specification and pricing error for the Consumption (C-) CAPM in the case where the model is optimally scaled by consumption-wealth ratio (CAY). Lettau and Ludvigson (2001b) show that the C-CAPM successfully explains a large portion (about 70%) of the cross-section of expected returns on Fama and French’s size and book-to-market portfolios, when the model is scaled linearly by CAY. In contrast, we use the methodology developed in Basu and Stremme (2005) to construct the optimal factor scaling as a (possibly non-linear) function of the conditioning variable (CAY), designed to minimize the model’s pricing error. We use a new measure of specification error, also developed in Basu and Stremme (2005), which allows us to analyze the performance of the model both in and out-of-sample. We find that the optimal factor loadings are indeed non-linear in the instrument, in contrast to the linear specification prevalent in the literature. While our optimally scaled C-CAPM explains about 80% of the cross-section of expected returns on the size and book-to-market portfolios (thus in fact out-performing the linearly scaled model of Lettau and Ludvigson (2001b)), it fails to explain the returns on portfolios sorted by industry. Moreover, although the optimal use of CAY does dramatically improve the performance of the model, even the scaled model fails our specification test (for either set of base assets), implying that the model still has large pricing errors. Out-of-sample, the performance of the model deteriorates further, failing even to explain any significant portion of the cross-section of expected returns. For comparison, we also test a scaled version of the classic CAPM and find that it has in fact smaller pricing errors than the scaled C-CAPM.
|Item Type:||Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)|
|Alternative Title:||Consumption-wealth ratio revisited: can optimal scaling resurrect the (consumption) capital asset pricing model?|
|Subjects:||H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory|
|Divisions:||Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Financial Econometrics Research Centre
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
|Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH):||Portfolio management, Capital assets pricing model, Conditional expectations (Mathematics), Capital -- Mathematical models, Investments -- Mathematical models|
|Series Name:||Working papers (Warwick Business School. Financial Econometrics Research Centre)|
|Publisher:||Warwick Business School, Financial Econometrics Research Centre|
|Place of Publication:||Coventry|
|Number of Pages:||42|
|Status:||Not Peer Reviewed|
|Access rights to Published version:||Open Access|
|References:||Abhyankar, A., D. Basu, and A. Stremme (2005): “The Optimal Use of Asset Return Predictability: An Empirical Analysis,” working paper, Warwick Business School. Basu, D., and A. Stremme (2005): “A Measure of Specification Error for Conditional Factor Models,” working paper, Warwick Business School. Breeden, D., M. Gibbons, and R. Litzenberger (1989): “Empirical Tests of the Consumption-Oriented CAPM,” Journal of Finance, 44(2), 231–262. Brennan, M., and Y. Xia (2005): “tay’s as good as cay,” Finance Research Letters, 2(1), 1–15. Campbell, J. (1987): “Stock Returns and the Term Structure,” Journal of Financial Economics, 18, 373–399. Campbell, J., and J. Cochrane (2000): “Explaining the Poor Performance of Consumption-Based Asset Pricing Models,” Journal of Finance, 55, 2863–2878. Fama, E., and K. French (1988): “Dividend Yields and Expected Stock Returns,” Journal of Financial Economics, 22, 3–25. Fama, E., and K. French (1992): “The Cross-Section of Expected Returns,” Journal of Finance, 47, 427–465. Ferson, W., S. Kandel, and R. Stambaugh (1987): “Tests of Asset Pricing with Time-Varying Expected Risk Premiums and Market Betas,” Journal of Finance, 42, 201–220. Ferson, W., and A. Siegel (2001): “The Efficient Use of Conditioning Information in Portfolios,” Journal of Finance, 56(3), 967–982. Ferson, W., A. Siegel, and T. Xu (2005): “Mimicking Portfolios with Conditioning Information,” forthcoming, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis. Ghysels, E. (1998): “On Stable Factor Structures in the Pricing of Risk: Do Time-Varying Betas Help or Hurt?,” Journal of Finance, 53, 549–573. Gibbons, M., S. Ross, and J. Shanken (1989): “A Test of Efficiency of a Given Portfolio,” Econometrica, 57(5), 1121–1152. Hansen, L., and R. Jagannathan (1997): “Assessing Specification Errors in Stochastic Discount Factor Models,” Journal of Finance, 52, 557–590. Hansen, L., and S. Richard (1987): “The Role of Conditioning Information in Deducing Testable Restrictions Implied by Dynamic Asset Pricing Models,” Econometrica, 55(3), 587–613. Hansen, L., and K. Singleton (1982): “Generalized Instrumental Variables Estimation of Nonlinear Rational Expectations Models,” Econometrica, 55, 1269–1286. Harvey, C. (1989): “Time-Varying Conditional Covariances in Tests of Asset Pricing Models,” Journal of Financial Economics, 24, 289–317. Hodrick, R., and X. Zhang (2001): “Evaluating the Specification Errors of Asset Pricing Models,” Journal of Financial Economics, 62, 327–376. Jagannathan, R. (1996): “Relation between the Slopes of the Conditional and Unconditional Mean-Standard Deviation Frontier of Asset Returns,” in Modern Portfolio Theory and its Applications: Inquiries into Asset Valuation Problems, ed. by S. Saito et al. Center for Academic Societies, Osaka, Japan. Lettau, M., and S. Ludvigson (2001a): “Consumption, Aggregate Wealth and Expected Stock Returns,” Journal of Finance, 56(3), 815–849. Lettau, M., and S. Ludvigson (2001b): “Resurrecting the (C)CAPM: A Cross-Sectional Test when Risk Premia are Time-Varying,” Journal of Political Economy, 109(6), 1238–1287. Lucas, R. (1978): “Asset Prices in an Exchange Economy,” Econometrica, 46, 1429–1445. Merton, R. (1973): “An Intertemporal Capital Asset Pricing Model,” Econometrica, 41(5), 867–887. Roll, R. (1977): “A Critique of the Asset Pricing Theorys Tests. Part I: On Past and Potential Testability of the Theory,” Journal of Financial Economics, 4, 129–176. Shanken, J. (1989): “Intertemporal Asset Pricing: An Empirical Investigation,” Journal of Econometrics, 45, 99–120.|
Actions (login required)