Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

A four year longitudinal sero-epidemiology study of Neospora caninum in adult cattle from 114 cattle herds in south west England : associations with age, herd and dam-offspring pairs

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Woodbine, Kerry A., Medley, Graham, Moore, Stephen J., Ramírez Villaescusa, Ana, Mason, Sam (Sam A.) and Green, Laura E.. (2008) A four year longitudinal sero-epidemiology study of Neospora caninum in adult cattle from 114 cattle herds in south west England : associations with age, herd and dam-offspring pairs. BMC Veterinary Research, Vol.4 (No.35). ISSN 1471-8219

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Medley_1746-6148-4-35.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (358Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1746-6148-4-35

Abstract

Background: Neosporosis caused by the protozoan parasite Neospora caninum, is an economically important cause of abortion, stillbirth, low milk yield, reduced weight gain and premature culling in cattle. Consequently, a seroepidemiological study of N. caninum antibodies was conducted in England with 29,782 samples of blood taken from 15,736 cattle from 114 herds visited on three occasions at yearly intervals. Herds were categorised into lower (< 10%) and higher (≥ 10%) median herd seroprevalence. Hierarchical models were run to investigate associations between the sample to positive (S/P) ratio and herd and cattle factors. Results: Ninety-four percent of herds had at least one seropositive cow; 12.9% of adult cattle had at least one seropositive test. Approximately 90% of herds were seropositive at all visits; 9 herds (8%) changed serological status between visits. The median N. caninum seroprevalence in positive herds was 10% (range 0.4% to 58.8%). There was a positive association between the serostatus of offspring and dams that were ever seropositive. In the hierarchical model of low seroprevalence herds there was no significant association between S/P ratio and cattle age. There was a significantly lower S/P ratio in cattle in herds that were totally restocked after the foot-and-mouth epidemic of 2001 compared with those from continuously stocked herds and cattle purchased into these herds had a higher S/P ratio than homebred cattle. In the model of high seroprevalence herds the S/P ratio increased with cattle age, but was not associated with restocking or cattle origin. Conclusion: There were no strong temporal changes in herd seroprevalence of N. caninum but 90% of herds had some seropositive cattle over this time period. Vertical transmission from seropositive dams appeared to occur in all herds. In herds with a high seroprevalence the increasing S/P ratio in 2–4 year old cattle is suggestive of exposure to N. caninum: horizontal transmission between adult cattle, infection from a local source or recrudescence and abortions. Between-herd movements of infected cattle enhance the spread of N. caninum, particularly into low seroprevalence herds. Some restocked herds had little exposure to N. caninum, while in others infection had spread in the time since restocking.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: S Agriculture > SF Animal culture
Q Science > QL Zoology
Divisions: Faculty of Science > Life Sciences (2010- ) > Biological Sciences ( -2010)
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Cattle -- Diseases -- Great Britain, Cattle -- Infections -- Great Britain
Journal or Publication Title: BMC Veterinary Research
Publisher: Biomed Central
ISSN: 1471-8219
Date: 15 December 2008
Volume: Vol.4
Number: No.35
Identification Number: 10.1186/1746-6148-4-35
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: 1. Davison HC, Otter A, Trees AJ: Significance of Neospora caninum in British dairy cattle determined by estimation of seroprevalence in normally calving cattle and aborting cattle. Int J Parasitol 1999, 29:1189-1194. 2. Hobson JC, Duffield TF, Kelton D, Lissemore K, Hietala SK, Leslie KE, McEwen B, Cramer G, Peregrine AS: Neospora caninum serostatus and milk production of Holstein cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2002, 221:1160-1164. 3. Barling KS, McNeill JW, Thompson JA: Association of serologic status for Neospora caninum with postweaning weight gain and carcass measurements in beef calves. J Am Vet Med Assoc 2000, 217:1356-1360. 4. Thurmond MC, Hietala SK: Culling associated with Neospora caninum infection in dairy cows. Am J Vet Res 1996, 57:1559-1562. 5. Thurmond MC, Hietala SK: Effect of congenitally acquired Neospora caninum infection on risk of abortion and subsequent abortions in dairy cattle. Am J Vet Res 1997, 58:1381-1385. 6. Trees AJ, Davison HC, Innes EA, Wastling JM: Towards evaluating the economic impact of bovine neosporosis. Int J Parasitol 1999, 29:1195-1200. 7. McAllister MM, Dubey JP, Lindsay DS, Jolley WR, Wills RA, McGuire AM: Dogs are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 1998, 28:1473-1478. 8. Gondim LF, McAllister MM, Pitt WC, Zemlicka DE: Coyotes (Canis latrans) are definitive hosts of Neospora caninum. Int J Parasitol 2004, 34:159-161. 9. Moore DP: Neosporosis in South America. Vet Parasitol 2005, 127:87-97. 10. Gondim LF: Neospora caninum in wildlife. Trends Parasitol 2006, 22:247-252. 11. Dubey JP: Recent advances in Neospora and neosporosis. Vet Parasitol 1999, 84:349-367. 12. Björkman C, Johansson O, Stenlund S, Holmdahl OJ, Uggla A: Neospora species infection in a herd of dairy cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1996, 208:1441-1444. 13. Stenlund S, Kindahl H, Magnusson U, Uggla A, Björkman C: Serum antibody profile and reproductive performance during two consecutive pregnancies of cows naturally infected with Neospora caninum. Vet Parasitol 1999, 85:227-234. 14. Innes EA, Wright S, Bartley P, Maley S, Macaldowie C, Esteban- Redondo I, Buxton D: The host-parasite relationship in bovine neosporosis. Vet Immunol Immunopathol 2005, 108:29-36. 15. Anderson ML, Reynolds JP, Rowe JD, Sverlow KW, Packham AE, Barr BC, Conrad PA: Evidence of vertical transmission of Neospora sp infection in dairy cattle. J Am Vet Med Assoc 1997, 210:1169-1172. 16. Frössling J, Uggla A, Björkman C: Prevalence and transmission of Neospora caninum within infected Swedish dairy herds. Vet Parasitol 2005, 128:209-218. 17. Hall CA, Reichel MP, Ellis JT: Neospora abortions in dairy cattle: diagnosis mode of transmission and control. Vet Parasitol 2005, 128:231-241. 18. Davison HC, Otter A, Trees AJ: Estimation of vertical and horizontal transmission parameters of Neospora caninum infections in dairy cattle. Int J Parasitol 1999, 29:1683-1689. 19. French NP, Clancy D, Davison HC, Trees AJ: Mathematical models of Neospora caninum infection in dairy cattle: transmission and options for control. Int J Parasitol 1999, 29:1691-1704. 20. Hietala SK, Thurmond MC: Postnatal Neospora caninum transmission and transient serologic responses in two dairies. Int J Parasitol 1999, 29:1668-1676. 21. Romero JJ, Frankena K: The effect of the dam-calf relationship on serostatus to Neospora caninum on 20 Costa Rican dairy farms. Vet Parasitol 2003, 114:159-171. 22. Wapenaar W, Barkema HW, Vanleeuwen JA, McClure JT, O'Handley RM, Kwok OC, Thulliez P, Dubey JP, Jenkins MC: Comparison of serological methods for the diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in cattle. Vet Parasitol 2007, 143:166-173. 23. Davison HC, French NP, Trees AJ: Herd-specific and age-specific seroprevalence of Neospora caninum in 14 British dairy herds. Vet Rec 1999, 144:547-550. 24. McNamee PT, Trees AJ, Guy F, Moffett D, Kilpatrick D: Diagnosis and prevalence of neosporosis in cattle in Northern Ireland. Vet Rec 1996, 138:419-420. 25. Trees AJ, Guy F, Low JC, Roberts L, Buxton D, Dubey JP: Serological evidence implicating Neospora species as a cause of abortion in British cattle. Vet Rec 1994, 134:405-407. 26. Bartels CJ, Arnaiz-Seco JI, Ruiz-Santa-Quitera A, Björkman C, Frössling J, von Blumröder D, Conraths FJ, Schares G, van Maanen C, Wouda W, Ortega-Mora LM: Supranational comparison of Neospora caninum seroprevalences in cattle in Germany The Netherlands Spain and Sweden. Vet Parasitol 2006, 137:17-27. 27. Williams DJ, Trees AJ: Protecting babies: vaccine strategies to prevent foetopathy in Neospora caninum-infected cattle. Parasite Immunol 2006, 28:61-67. 28. Dubey JP, Schares G, Ortega-Mora LM: Epidemiology and control of neosporosis and Neospora caninum. Clin Microbiol Rev 2007, 20:323-367. 29. Bourne J: Bovine TB: The Scientific Evidence. A science base for a sustainable policy to control TB in cattle. An epidemiological investigation into bovine tuberculosis. Defra Final Report 2007. 30. Keeling MJ, Woolhouse ME, May RM, Davies G, Grenfell BT: Modelling vaccination strategies against foot-and-mouth disease. Nature 2003, 421:136-142. 31. von Blumröder D, Schares G, Norton R, Williams DJ, Esteban- Redondo I, Wright S, Björkman C, Frössling J, Risco-Castillo V, Fernández- García A, Ortega-Mora LM, Sager H, Hemphill A, van Maanen C, Wouda W, Conraths FJ: Comparison and standardisation of serological methods for the diagnosis of Neospora caninum infection in bovines. Vet Parasitol 2004, 120:11-22. 32. Rasbash J, Browne W, Goldstein H, Yang M, Plewis I, Healy M, Woodhouse G, Draper D, Langford I, Lewis T: A user's guide to MLwiN version 21d for use with MLwiN 1.10. Centre for Multilevel Modelling Institute of Education University of London 2000. 33. Stenlund S, Kindahl H, Magnusson U, Uggla A, Björkman C: Serum antibody profile and reproductive performance during two consecutive pregnancies of cows naturally infected with Neospora caninum. Vet Parasitol 1999, 85:227-234. 34. Häsler B, Hernandez JA, Reist M, Sager H, Steiner-Moret C, Staubli D, Stärk KDC, Gottstein B: Neospora caninum: Serological followup in dairy cows during pregnancy. Vet Parasitol 2006, 137:222-230. 35. Otranto D, Llazari A, Testini G, Traversa D, Frangipane di Regalbono A, Badan M, Capelli G: Seroprevalence and associated risk factors of neosporosis in beef and dairy cattle in Italy. Vet Parasitol 2003, 118:7-18. 36. Kyaw T, Virakul P, Muangyai M, Suwimonteerabutr J: Neospora caninum seroprevalence in dairy cattle in central Thailand. Vet Parasitol 2004, 121:255-263. 37. Green LE: Improving farm animal health – understanding infectious endemic disease. Proceedings of the SVEPM conference: March 2007; Finland 2007:13-25. 38. Sanderson MW, Gay JM, Baszler TV: Neospora caninum seroprevalence and associated risk factors in beef cattle in the northwestern United States. Vet Parasitol 2000, 90:15-24.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/179

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us