Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login
  • Admin

Recycling bins, garbage cans or think tanks? Three myths regarding policy analysis institutes

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Stone, Diane (2007) Recycling bins, garbage cans or think tanks? Three myths regarding policy analysis institutes. Public Administration, Vol.85 (No.2). pp. 259-278. doi:10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00649.x

[img]
Preview
PDF (Article Main Text)
WRAP_Stone_PA_Garbage_Bins_2.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (141Kb)
[img] PDF (Blackwell Policy)
WRAP_Stone_Garbage_elf_.pdf
Embargoed item. Restricted access to Repository staff only - Requires a PDF viewer.

Download (28Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00649.x

Request Changes to record.

Abstract

The phrase 'think tank' has become ubiquitous – overworked and underspecified – in the political lexicon. It is entrenched in scholarly discussions of public policy as well as in the 'policy wonk' of journalists, lobbyists and spin-doctors. This does not mean that there is an agreed definition of think tank or consensual understanding of their roles and functions. Nevertheless, the majority of organizations with this label undertake policy research of some kind. The idea of think tanks as a research communication 'bridge' presupposes that there are discernible boundaries between (social) science and policy. This paper will investigate some of these boundaries. The frontiers are not only organizational and legal; they also exist in how the 'public interest' is conceived by these bodies and their financiers. Moreover, the social interactions and exchanges involved in 'bridging', themselves muddy the conception of 'boundary', allowing for analysis to go beyond the dualism imposed in seeing science on one side of the bridge, and the state on the other, to address the complex relations between experts and public policy.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: J Political Science > JN Political institutions (Europe) > JN101 Great Britain
J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Research institutes, Politics, Practical, Communication -- Political aspects, Policy scientists
Journal or Publication Title: Public Administration
Publisher: Wiley-Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
ISSN: 0033-3298
Official Date: June 2007
Dates:
DateEvent
June 2007Published
Volume: Vol.85
Number: No.2
Page Range: pp. 259-278
DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9299.2007.00649.x
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
Funder: Sixth Framework Programme (European Commission) (FP6)

Data sourced from Thomson Reuters' Web of Knowledge

Request changes or add full text files to a record

Repository staff actions (login required)

View Item View Item
twitter

Email us: wrap@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us