Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Using knowledge: the dilemmas of 'bridging research and policy'

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Stone, Diane, 1964-. (2002) Using knowledge: the dilemmas of 'bridging research and policy'. Compare, Vol.32 (No.3). pp. 285-296. ISSN 0305-7925

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Stone_Compare.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (107Kb)
Official URL: http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0305792022000007454

Abstract

The 'knowledge agenda' has become a central part of development discourse. This paper addresses one aspect of this discourse - the use of policy research in the social sciences - and the dilemmas that have been encountered by both development agencies and researchers in communicating and making use of that research. Development agencies as well as NGOs have initiated work to evaluate and document the effectiveness of research partnerships, knowledge capacity building and (social) science policy impact. As a multilateral initiative, the Global Development Network (GDN), and especially its 'Bridging Research and Policy' project, provides a vehicle to address issues related to research impact. Twelve perspectives on improving research and policy linkages are outlined to reveal that how the problem is defined shapes policy responses. Taken together, these explanations provide a multifaceted picture of the research-policy nexus indicating that there are many possible routes to 'bridging' research and policy. These diverse perspectives will be categorised into three broad categories of explanation: (i) supply-side; (ii) demand-led; and (iii) policy currents. However, knowledge is part of the solution to many development problems but not of itself a panacea.

Item Type: Journal Article
Subjects: J Political Science > JA Political science (General)
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Politics and International Studies
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Global Development Network, Political development, Knowledge, Sociology of, Non-governmental organizations, Political sociology
Journal or Publication Title: Compare
Publisher: Routledge
ISSN: 0305-7925
Date: October 2002
Volume: Vol.32
Number: No.3
Page Range: pp. 285-296
Identification Number: 10.1080/0305792022000007454
Status: Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: * 1. COOKE, B. & KOTHARI, U. (Eds) (2001) Participation: The New Tyranny? (London, Zed Books). * 2. DANIDA (2001) Partnerships at the Leading Edge: A Danish Vision for Knowledge, Research and Development, Report of the Commission on Development-Related Research (Ministry of Foreign Affairs Danida, Copenhagen). * 3. ESRC/DEPARTMBNT FOR EMPLOYMENT AND EDUCATION (2000) 'Influence or Irrelevance: Can Social Science improve Government?', Secretary of State's ESRC Lecture Speech 2 February 2000, ESRC/DfEE. * 4. GARRBTT, J. L., & ISLAM, Y. (1998) 'Policy Research and the Policy Process: Do the twain ever meet?', Gatekeeper Series, No. 74, International Institute for Environment and Development. * 5. KEBLBY, J. & SCOONES, I. (1999) 'Understanding Environmental Policy Processes: A Review', IDS Working Paper 89, Sussex, IDS. * 6. KFPE (Swiss COMMISSION FOR RESEARCH PARTNERSHIPS WITH DEVELOPING COUNTRIES) (Ed.) (2001 ) Enhancing Research Capacity in Developing and Transition Countries (Berne, Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships in Developing Countries). * 7. KRAUSE HANSEN, H., SALSKOV-IVERSBN, D. & BISLBV, S. (2002) Transnational Discourse Communities: Globalizing Public Management', in: R. HIGGOTT & M. OUGAARD (Eds) Understanding the Global Polity (London, Routledge). * 8. MAXWELL, S. (2001) 'Is Anyone Listening?', Paper presented at the GDN Annual Conference, Tokyo. Available at: http://www2.ids.ac.uk/gdnet/subpages/maxwell.pdf * 9. McGANN, J. & WEAVER, R. K. (Eds) (2000) Think Tanks and Civil Societies: Catalysts for Ideas and Action (Sommerset, NJ, Transaction Press). * 10. NEILSON, S. (2001) IDRC-Supported Research and Its Influence on Public Policy, Evaluation Unit, IDRC, Canada. Available at: http://www.idrc.ca/evaluation/litreview_e.html. * 11. NORRAG (2001) 'The Globalisation of Development Knowledge', NORRAG News, No. 29, December, Northern Policy Research Review and Advisory Network on Education and Training. * 12. PARMAR, I. (2002) 'American Foundations and the Development of International Knowledge Networks', Global Networks, 2(1). * 13. RAWOO (NETHERLANDS DEVELOPMENT ASSISTANCE RESEARCH COUNCIL) (2001) 'Utilization of Research for Development Cooperation: Linking Knowledge Production to Development Policy and Practice', Publication No. 21, The Hague, Netherlands Development Assistance Research Council. * 14. SECK, D. & COLVIN PHILLIPS, L. (Eds) (2002) Adjusting Structural Adjustment: Best Practices in Policy Research in Africa, forthcoming. * 15. SPAAPEN, J. with WAMELINK, F. (2001) 'Utilization of research in north and south: A review of recent literature', in: RAWOO (Ed.) 'Utilization of Research for Development Cooperation: Linking Knowledge Production to Development Policy and Practice', Publication No. 21, The Hague, Netherlands Development Assistance Research Council. * 16. SQUIRE, L. (2000) 'Why the World Bank Should Be Involved in Development Research', in: G. L. GILBERT & D. VINES (Eds) The World Bank: Structure and Policies (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press). * 17. STARES, P. & WEAVER, R. K. (Eds) (2001) Alternative Policy Advisory Organizations (Tokyo, Japan Center for International Exchange & Washington DC, Brookings Institution). * 18. STONE, D. (Ed.) (2002) Special edition on 'Global Knowledge and Advocacy Networks', Global Networks, 2(1). * 19. SUTTON, R. (1999) 'The Policy Process: An Overview', ODI Working Paper 118, London, Overseas Development Institute. * 20. SVERDRUP, K. (2001) 'Surveys of the Research Sector in Partner Countries as a Basis for Norwegian Support for Higher Education and Research', in: KFPE (Ed.) Enhancing Research Capacity in Developing and Transition Countries (Berne, Swiss Commission for Research Partnerships in Developing Countries). * 21. TILAK, J. (2001) Knowledge Development and International Aid, in: W. GMELIN, K. KINO & S. McGRATH (Eds) Development Knowledge, National Research and International Co-operation (Edinburgh, Bonn & Geneva, CAS/DSE/NORRAG). * 22. VALDES, J. G. (1995) Pinochet's Economists: The Chicago School in Chile (Cambridge, Cambridge University Press). * 23. WORLD BANK (1999) Knowledge for Development: World Development Report 1998/99 (New York, Oxford University Press).
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1799

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us