Skip to content Skip to navigation
University of Warwick
  • Study
  • |
  • Research
  • |
  • Business
  • |
  • Alumni
  • |
  • News
  • |
  • About

University of Warwick
Publications service & WRAP

Highlight your research

  • WRAP
    • Home
    • Search WRAP
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse WRAP by Year
    • Browse WRAP by Subject
    • Browse WRAP by Department
    • Browse WRAP by Funder
    • Browse Theses by Department
  • Publications Service
    • Home
    • Search Publications Service
    • Browse by Warwick Author
    • Browse Publications service by Year
    • Browse Publications service by Subject
    • Browse Publications service by Department
    • Browse Publications service by Funder
  • Statistics
  • Help & Advice
University of Warwick

The Library

  • Login

Tracking error: ex-ante versus ex-post measures

Tools
- Tools
+ Tools

Hwang, Soosung and Satchell, S. (Stephen) (2001) Tracking error: ex-ante versus ex-post measures. Working Paper. Warwick Business School, Financial Econometrics Research Centre, Coventry.

[img]
Preview
PDF
WRAP_Hwang_fwp01-15.pdf - Requires a PDF viewer such as GSview, Xpdf or Adobe Acrobat Reader

Download (388Kb)
Official URL: http://www2.warwick.ac.uk/fac/soc/wbs/research/wfr...

Abstract

In this paper we show that ex-ante and ex-post tracking errors must necessarily differ, since portfolio weights are ex-post stochastic in nature. In particular, ex-post tracking error is always larger than ex-ante tracking error. Our results imply that fund managers always have a higher ex-post tracking error than their planned tracking error, and thus unless our results are considered, any performance fee based on ex-post tracking error is unfavourable to fund managers.

Item Type: Working or Discussion Paper (Working Paper)
Subjects: H Social Sciences > HB Economic Theory
H Social Sciences > HD Industries. Land use. Labor > HD61 Risk Management
Divisions: Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School > Financial Econometrics Research Centre
Faculty of Social Sciences > Warwick Business School
Library of Congress Subject Headings (LCSH): Risk management, Portfolio management, Indexation (Economics), Stochastic analysis
Series Name: Working papers (Warwick Business School. Financial Econometrics Research Centre)
Publisher: Warwick Business School, Financial Econometrics Research Centre
Place of Publication: Coventry
Date: 2001
Number: No.01-
Number of Pages: 13
Status: Not Peer Reviewed
Access rights to Published version: Open Access
References: Baierl, G. T. and P. Chen, 2000, “Choosing Managers and Funds,” Journal of Portfolio Management 26(2), 47-53. Gardner, D. and D. Bowie, 2000, M Brooks and M. Cumberworth, “Predicted Tracking Errors Fact or Fantasy?,” Faculty and Institute of Actuaries, Investment Conference paper, 25-27 June 2000. Grinold, R. and R. Kahn, 1995, Active Portfolio Management, Irwin. Gupta, F., R. Prajogi, and E. Stubbs, 1999, “The Information Ratio and Performance,” Journal of Portfolio Management (Fall 1999), 33-39. Larsen, G. A. and B. G. Resnick,, 1998, “Empirical Insights on Indexing,” Journal of Portfolio Management 25(1), 51-60. Lawton-Browne, C. L. 2001, Cross-reference, Journal of Asset Management. Markowitz, H. M., 1959, Portfolio Selection, 1st Edition, New York: John Wiley & Sons. Pope, P. and P. K. Yadav, 1994, “Discovering Error in Tracking Error,” Journal of Portfolio Management (Winter 1994), 27-32. Roll, R., 1992, “A Mean/Variance Analysis of Tracking Error,” Journal of Portfolio Management, 13-22. Rudolf, M., H. Wolter, and H. Zimmermann, 1999, “A Linear Model for Tracking Error Minimization,” Journal of Banking and Finance 23, 85-103. Sharpe, W, 1964, “Capital asset prices : A Theory of Capital Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk,” Journal of Finance 19, 425-442.
URI: http://wrap.warwick.ac.uk/id/eprint/1813

Request changes to a record

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item

Document Downloads

More statistics for this item...
twitter

Email us: publications@warwick.ac.uk
Contact Details
About Us